Recent coverage by the New York Times, particularly a piece by Glenn Thrush, aims to undermine Judge Jeanine Pirro’s role as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. However, the article inadvertently reveals key facts about her work ethic and success in winning over a wary staff. Pirro, who began her career as an assistant district attorney in 1975, has built an impressive resume as a judge and district attorney in New York before transitioning to media. Now at the age of 74, she is back in public service, accepted by many in the legal community despite initial skepticism.
Despite the Times’ snarky tone, the article conveys that Pirro is dedicated to her new position. She is reportedly putting in long hours and proving her commitment to the job. The report notes that she works from a rented apartment in Washington during the week, commuting home to New York on weekends. This is not the behavior of someone who is taking the position lightly; instead, it reflects a serious commitment to the responsibilities that come with being a U.S. Attorney.
Thrush’s article also mentions how Pirro engages with her staff, holding daily briefings and being present in important court proceedings. For instance, her careful handling of a tragic shooting incident that resulted in the deaths of two Israeli Embassy employees earned her respect from those around her. She approached that situation with professionalism, contrasting sharply with the flippancy sometimes associated with her TV persona.
Moreover, Pirro’s recent interview with President Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, sheds light on her strong connection to the current administration. “I LOVE WORKING FOR HIM, I’M PROUD OF HIM,” she stated, emphasizing her belief in the President and his commitment to safety and security for Americans. Her dedication to addressing issues such as gun violence underscored her determination to make a tangible difference in the community.
In closing, the New York Times article may have aimed to cast Pirro in an unflattering light, but it inadvertently highlights her resolve and ability to adapt, both to the challenges of her new role and to the expectations of those around her. As she pointedly stated, “This is my calling; this is who I am. I have fought for the underdog — for the silent victim of crime — my whole life.” Such passion reveals her deeper motivations beyond mere career advancement.
"*" indicates required fields
