President Donald Trump’s peacemaking efforts have recently gained acknowledgment from unexpected quarters. On Monday, Fox News’ “The Five” featured former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr. from Tennessee, who commended Trump for his work in potentially resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Ford, who served in Congress until 2007, stated, “I give President Trump tremendous credit for where we are,” emphasizing that if Trump succeeds, he would deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.
This recognition from a Democrat, even a former one, highlights a shift in the discourse surrounding Trump’s foreign policy maneuvers. Ford is not the only liberal voice to offer praise. Comedian Bill Maher, known for his critical stance on Trump, also recently acknowledged the president’s ability to bring about peace. During an episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher,” he noted, “This would be the good in Donald Trump. He really does not like war.” He outlined a range of conflicts that Trump has intervened in, from disputes between Thailand and Cambodia to tensions involving India and Pakistan.
Comments from Ford and Maher illustrate a growing recognition among some Democrats of Trump’s role in fostering peace. This contrasts sharply with the prevailing sentiment of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has overtaken much of the party. As Maher put it, if even the staunchest critics can find merit in Trump’s peacemaking, it indicates that there might be broader acknowledgment of his contributions.
Ford remarked on the possibility of Trump receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, saying, “I would hope you would invite me down to the White House when the president is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, because he would absolutely deserve it.” This sentiment resonates in a climate where acknowledging accomplishments can lead to a less divisive conversation about leadership and effectiveness.
For liberal voices, recognizing Trump’s achievements might help mitigate the extreme views that have colored political debates for years. By giving credit where it’s due, these figures can contribute to a more balanced appraisal of a president often judged solely through a partisan lens.
"*" indicates required fields
