The ongoing battle over election integrity in Texas has reached a pivotal moment. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump recently visited Kerrville, Texas, where communities are reeling from devastating flooding. Meanwhile, a more insidious issue is brewing in the shadows: the struggle for control over the state’s election processes. In a startling decision in 2021, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals curtailed the authority of Attorney General Ken Paxton, a staunch advocate for election integrity. The court stripped his office of the power to independently prosecute election fraud, a right held for over seventy years.
Paxton views this ruling as a significant setback, one that strengthens the hand of Democrats who thrive on lax enforcement of election laws. “This ruling is a calculated gift to Democrats,” Paxton argues, as it allows those engaged in potentially fraudulent practices to operate under protective cover. With their ability to challenge evidence now limited, Republicans are taking steps to push back.
Representative Matt Shaheen has introduced House Joint Resolution 1 and House Bill 11 aimed at restoring the Attorney General’s independent prosecutorial authority. They are pressing this legislation rapidly through the system, bolstered by support from Governor Greg Abbott, who has made election integrity a primary focus as the special session concludes. It’s a timely initiative, given the current constraints on Paxton’s office, which now requires a local district attorney’s invitation to act—a gatekeeping rule that has proven ineffective.
With evidence of fraud often ignored by Democrat-aligned local prosecutors, Paxton has expressed frustration: “Rogue district and county attorneys are deliberately declining to prosecute cases that threaten their own political machines.” Such a system, he argues, invites abuse and undermines the integrity of the electoral process.
The recent rulings and their implications crystallized in a notable case: Paxton pursued a southeast Texas sheriff suspected of ballot fraud following the 2016 election. When faced with a recalcitrant local district attorney, Paxton’s authority was challenged in court, leading to a ruling that cut local prosecutors from oversight of a vital area of law enforcement.
As Republicans rush to restore Paxton’s independence, they have enacted House Bill 5115, set to take effect on September 1. This legislation significantly elevates the penalties for voter fraud, upgrading offenses from misdemeanors to felonies, which could lead to incarceration for up to 20 years. Under the new law, actions such as lying on a voter application, altering ballots, or forging signatures carry penalties equivalent to serious crimes. This shift stands in stark contrast to penalties in many other states, where voter fraud typically results merely in fines.
Amid assertions from Democrats and their media allies that voter fraud is “rare,” statistics paint a different picture. Since 2005, over 1,400 cases of election fraud have been documented nationwide, according to the Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database. In Texas, Paxton has prosecuted nearly 100 cases of voter fraud despite facing significant limitations. “And those are just the cases caught,” he notes. Many more instances slip through the cracks when local prosecutors refuse to act.
The fight in Texas is emblematic of a broader national struggle over election integrity. In states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin—critical battlegrounds in the upcoming elections—local officials have been known to overlook irregularities. Empowering state attorneys general like Paxton to act without local hindrances may be essential for ensuring accountability across party lines.
Trump has long emphasized the importance of strengthening election integrity, declaring it a cornerstone of democracy. He warns that Democrats prefer weak laws, weak prosecutors, and weak enforcement, thereby eroding the foundation of fair elections. Republicans, on the other hand, are standing firm against such erosion, as they recognize the importance of guarding the electoral process against manipulation.
The stakes in this legislative battle couldn’t be higher. As Texas Republicans seek to restore necessary powers and tighten legal ramifications for election fraud, the response from Democratic factions, along with their supporters in the media, will undoubtedly intensify. The outcome will have significant implications not just for Texas, but for election integrity nationwide.
"*" indicates required fields
