Recent events have highlighted a troubling trend among certain public figures in their responses to tragedy. Following the mass shooting at the Annunciation Catholic Church and school in Minneapolis, Jen Psaki, former press secretary in the Biden administration, made headlines with her dismissive comments about prayer. In a post on X, she scoffed at the notion of offering “thoughts and prayers,” claiming it does nothing to alleviate the suffering caused by such horrific incidents. “Prayer is not freaking enough. Prayers do not end school shootings. Prayer does not bring these kids back,” Psaki insisted.
This callousness did not sit well with Vice President JD Vance, who swiftly rebuked her. Vance argued that prayer is vital in times of grief, stating, “We pray because our hearts are broken. We pray because we know God listens. We pray because we know that God works in mysterious ways, and can inspire us to further action.” He pointed out the absurdity of attacking those who seek solace through prayer in the wake of tragedy. “Why do you feel the need to attack other people for praying when kids were just killed praying?” he asked.
Vance went further, labeling Psaki’s comments as a bizarre manifestation of modern leftism. He remarked, “Of all the weird left wing culture wars in the last few years, this is by far the most bizarre. ‘How dare you pray for innocent people in the midst of tragedy?!’ What are you even talking about?”
The vice president wasn’t alone in his condemnation. Observers from various corners criticized Psaki’s stance. Sean Davis of The Federalist suggested that her comments reflected an “actual demon,” highlighting a significant disconnect between the left’s rhetoric and the values many hold dear, particularly in moments of mourning.
Several motivations behind Psaki’s dismissal of prayer emerged during discussions. For starters, some believe that liberals often seize on school shootings to push for anti-gun legislation. In this context, “enough with the thoughts and prayers” translates to calls for greater gun control measures. The tactic is perceived as an attempt to undermine the spiritual response many people instinctively turn to in crisis.
Another factor is the political landscape; President Trump had called for prayers following the tragedy, making Psaki’s critique seem politically charged. Her derision of prayer can be viewed as a direct affront to the values held by those who align with Trump.
Finally, at a deeper level, some argue that many on the left harbor a fundamental disdain for prayer itself. For them, the state assumes a god-like role, and any appeal to a higher power is seen as a challenge to their authority. A response from an observer highlighted this sentiment: “Nah, let’s be clear, Comrade. You want us all to pray to the State, you Communist apparatchik.” This remark encapsulates the view that for some on the left, the veneration of governmental power eclipses traditional faith.
In summary, Psaki’s remarks reveal a broader ideological battle where foundational values of faith, hope, and personal solace clash with a more cynical worldview. Her words did more than criticize prayer; they attempted to redefine the narrative around tragedy and response. The attacks on prayer, particularly in the aftermath of such devastating events, reflect an absence of empathy and raise concerns about the motivations underpinning such statements, which appear more concerned with political gain than genuine comfort for those grieving.
"*" indicates required fields
