Recent events surrounding the far-left organization CASA have raised significant concerns regarding the motivations and affiliations of certain activist groups in America. This organization, which receives partial funding from George and Alex Soros’s Open Society Foundation, has been behind a rally supporting Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Garcia faces serious accusations: he is alleged to be a member of the notorious MS-13 gang, a human trafficker, and a domestic abuser. As the Trump administration prepares for his deportation to Uganda, CASA’s involvement has sparked outrage among those advocating for stricter immigration enforcement.
During the rally, CASA’s Lydia Walther-Rodriguez acted as a translator for Garcia, presenting his claims that the Trump administration has victimized him. This narrative has been contested by many, particularly in light of Garcia’s alleged history. Reports indicate that the Open Society Foundation has provided millions to CASA, including a recent $250,000 grant and an additional $1.6 million to CASA in Action. This funding supports their broader political activities, including efforts that promote mass immigration.
In a stark clash, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has publicly condemned the actions of liberal Judge Paula Xinis, who mandated a 72-hour notice before deportation proceedings. On August 22, 2025, she expressed her frustration on social media, asserting, “Activist liberal judges have attempted to obstruct our law enforcement every step of the way in removing the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens from our country.” She criticized the judge’s ruling, emphasizing the need to prioritize public safety and denouncing any leniency for individuals with serious criminal backgrounds.
This situation is not an isolated incident. George Soros’s influence in American politics stretches far and wide, with numerous far-left NGOs receiving significant funding from his Open Society Foundations. Reports indicate that over $20 million has flowed to groups like Community Change Action, which has been involved in protests against the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce crime in Washington, D.C. These groups appear to be linked to broader movements that some critics argue exacerbate crime and undermine community safety.
Caitlin Sutherland from Americans for Public Trust has criticized the involvement of these dark money-funded organizations. She pointed out the irony of a protest aimed at “Free DC” being organized by a group that itself relies heavily on external funding for its agenda. “DC is facing shootings, carjackings, and assaults,” Sutherland noted. Yet, despite those rising concerns, groups backed by significant financial resources choose to promote narratives that many believe hinder justice and community safety.
The implications of these events extend beyond individual cases like Garcia’s. They highlight a growing chasm in American society regarding issues of immigration, safety, and the influence of wealthy patrons on social movements. As public outcry rises against the perceived leniency toward serious offenders, the reactions from officials like Secretary Noem demonstrate a commitment to stricter enforcement and accountability. Tensions are escalating as community members and their representatives grapple with the ongoing challenges of crime and illegal immigration, exacerbated by the activities of well-funded activist groups.
This rally and its context reveal the complexities surrounding immigration debates in the U.S. They illustrate how activism, funding, and judicial actions can intertwine, often leading to significant repercussions for public safety and community order. Observers are left to question the motivations driving these movements and the impact they have on American lives, particularly in urban areas grappling with crime and safety concerns.
"*" indicates required fields
