On July 8, 2025, a confrontation unfolded at the Ontario Advanced Surgery Center in Ontario, California, involving two medical workers and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Jose de Jesus Ortega and Danielle Nadine Davila reportedly obstructed the arrest of Denis Guillen-Solis, an undocumented immigrant from Honduras. Video evidence shows Davila placing herself between an officer and Guillen-Solis while Ortega physically interfered by grabbing an officer’s arm.
Guillen-Solis was not a patient at the surgery center but reportedly sought refuge inside. The medical workers’ actions drew immediate scrutiny and led to their arrest on July 25, 2025. Initially, Ortega and Davila faced significant charges, including assault against a federal officer and conspiracy to interfere with official duties. These actions, carefully recorded on video, captured a moment that sparked fierce debate over the role of medical facilities amid immigration enforcement.
The situation escalated when, on August 19, 2025, their charges were reduced to misdemeanors. However, this reprieve was short-lived. On August 27, 2025, a federal grand jury indicted both Ortega and Davila on a felony charge each for assaulting, resisting, and impeding federal officers. The reinstatement of the serious charges highlighted the legal ramifications following their initial, more lenient treatment.
This incident is emblematic of the broader tensions surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States and the response from various sectors, including healthcare. The actions of Ortega and Davila have raised questions about the limits of medical workers’ autonomy when faced with federal enforcement actions within healthcare settings. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar future encounters, igniting discussions about the intersection of healthcare, immigration, and law enforcement.
As the legal proceedings develop, both workers now face a path fraught with uncertainty, highlighting the complex nature of immigration laws and their enforcement in America today. The ramifications of this case resonate not just within the walls of the Ontario Advanced Surgery Center but also in the broader community, as perceptions of duty and legality clash in a rapidly changing socio-political landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
