In a fiery segment on CNN’s “NewsNight,” host Abby Phillip faced a robust rebuttal from former Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker over claims regarding Elon Musk’s intentions with Social Security and Medicaid. During a town hall meeting in Green Bay, Phillip suggested that Musk was advocating for cuts to these crucial programs through his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). However, Walker, who was present at the event, quickly corrected her.
Phillip stated, “He came to the state, he talked about cutting Medicaid, Social Security through DOGE.” This assertion ignited a sharp response from Walker. “Actually, he said he would not cut Social Security,” he remarked. “That was exactly what he said at his rally… But I was there. I watched him.” This insistence on firsthand experience was pivotal in Walker’s defense against the misrepresentation of Musk’s position.
Further emphasizing Musk’s commitment, Walker cited Musk’s clear promise: “I want to emphasize that: as a result of the work of DOGE, legitimate recipients of Social Security will receive more money, not less money.” Walker questioned Phillip’s narrative, particularly her mention of alleged discussions at the rally about cuts to Medicaid and Social Security. He asserted, “No, I was at the rally. Protesters said it, but nobody who was actually there did.”
Phillip attempted to expand her argument, saying, “Other people at his rallies… talked about those issues.” This assertion of hearsay didn’t deter Walker. “That’s not at all what they said,” he replied firmly. He pointed out that the claims of vast fraud and age-related benefits were misleading. “What he talked about were people who were over 120 years old,” he noted, dismissing implications that these claims warranted cuts to existing programs.
The exchange highlights a broader media narrative that often misconstrues positions for political gain. Walker urged for clarity in communication, especially regarding sensitive subjects like Social Security. He referenced his own experiences in the political arena, illustrating how false narratives can shape public perception. “Early on in that recall process, Time magazine called me ‘dead man Walker,’” he recounted, emphasizing the maligning narratives that overshadow the realities of political efforts.
Walker’s advice for those involved with Musk and DOGE was straightforward: “Keep giving actual examples of what they’re doing. Make it abundantly clear that that’s not being touched.” The emphasis here aligns with a call for transparency, enduringly necessary in political discourse.
The interview serves as a potent reminder of the need for accuracy in reporting and the importance of direct engagement. Walker’s robust defense against misinformation reflects a growing frustration with narratives that cloud public understanding of critical issues related to government programs. By challenging these narratives, he not only protected Musk’s stance but also stressed the need for responsible journalism and accountability when discussing the implications of government policy changes.
"*" indicates required fields
