On August 29, 2025, Congresswoman Maxine Waters took to MSNBC’s The Weeknight, igniting controversy with her call to invoke the 25th Amendment against President Donald Trump. She alleges that his recent executive decisions signify a disturbing trend, asserting, “something’s wrong with this president.” Waters cited the removal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, which Trump justified by claiming she misrepresented mortgage data. “This could upend the entire economy,” Waters warned, framing the situation as not just economic mismanagement, but a constitutional crisis.
In her interview, Waters did not hold back. She insisted it is critical to act decisively against what she sees as a threat to democracy. “I would suggest that we move very aggressively to talk about the danger to this country and to our democracy and not play around with this,” she stated, underscoring a grave concern about Trump’s increasingly authoritarian behavior.
Waters’ language painted a vivid picture of urgency. She described Trump’s actions as “extraordinarily dangerous,” suggesting they reflect “the makings of a dictator who is trying to control the entire economy.” Such claims echo her long-standing apprehensions regarding Trump’s leadership and its implications for democratic norms. The congresswoman called the firing of Cook a “flagrant” violation of the Constitution, advocating for Trump’s cabinet to step in and take action, even as she recognized that compliance could be unlikely.
This isn’t the first time Waters has expressed her concerns about Trump, and her latest remarks continue in a familiar vein. Waters, who has long criticized the former president’s disregard for traditional governance and accountability, now compels others to understand the financial implications of his choices. “These moves threaten our financial stability and democratic principles,” she emphasized.
The alarmism in Waters’ rhetoric invites criticism. Some may suggest that her consistent calls for urgent action could reflect a deeper issue of partisan anxiety rather than objective assessment. However, her conviction remains clear: Trump’s presidency, in her view, poses a serious and immediate risk. She advocates for vigilance, urging stakeholders to consider the broader ramifications of such leadership.
"*" indicates required fields
