The rising rates of autism diagnoses in the United States have sparked intense debate. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has drawn attention to this concerning trend, presenting it as a warning to the public and igniting fierce criticism from autism advocates. They argue that “children with autism are not broken” and can lead fulfilling lives. However, an analysis of the educational and employment outcomes for those on the spectrum reveals a reality that contradicts this narrative.
Statistics from New Jersey expose a stark truth: 1 in 20 boys and 1 in 85 girls receive an autism diagnosis. Nationwide, the prevalence has surged from 1 in 36 children to 1 in 31, marking an increase that is nearly fivefold since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began tracking autism rates in the early 1990s. Current data shows autism rates at approximately 23 per 1,000 children, a steep rise from 0.5 per 1,000 in earlier decades like the 1960s and ’70s.
This dramatic increase raises questions about the factors contributing to these changes. While some posit that better diagnosis and awareness account for the rise, studies reveal that these explanations only cover part of the increase. A 2009 study recorded a staggering 7- to 8-fold increase in autism incidence from the early 1990s to 2007, with only a fraction attributable to changes in diagnostic criteria.
Further scrutiny of historical data, such as Victor Lotter’s 1966 Middlesex schools survey, shows that autism was exceedingly rare. Lotter reported just 0.045% prevalence among schoolchildren, and similar findings persisted throughout the 1970s and ’80s. A speech therapist mentioned that in the 1980s, autism barely appeared in training programs due to its scarcity. Even Dr. Thomas Insel, former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, noted that the admission of one autistic child was so uncommon that medical residents were brought in to witness it.
Despite recent efforts to celebrate neurodiversity, evidence suggests that many of these notions do not hold up under scrutiny. Claims of “superpowers” within the autistic population, like exceptional memory or math skills, lack strong statistical support. Only about 10% of individuals with autism possess true savant skills, and estimates vary widely, with some placing the incidence as low as 1 in 200. Research into executive functioning indicates persistent deficits in planning, problem-solving, and organization, countering the idea of inherent strengths in attention to detail.
Employment statistics reveal a troubling picture as well. While a widely cited 2017 survey claimed that 61% of autistic adults were employed, the methodology invites skepticism due to its volunteer-based approach, which may exclude those with more significant support needs. Longitudinal studies tell a more sobering story; approximately 75-85% of autistic adults struggle with unemployment, and just 40% hold jobs after eight years. Alarmingly, fewer than 2% of these individuals achieve full self-sufficiency.
Living independently presents its own challenges. Research from the National Institutes of Health shows that only 5% of autistic adults can live independently, whereas 37% require overnight care, and 87% live with their parents. In contrast, 34% of individuals with intellectual disabilities can manage independent living—significantly more than those within the autism spectrum.
While advocacy groups tout that 74% of autistic students in special education “graduate with a diploma,” this figure can be misleading. Many diplomas awarded under Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) do not equate to state-standard diplomas. Modifications often permit graduation despite significant reductions in academic standards. Reports also inflate college graduation rates, noting that 39% of autistic students earn a degree within eight years. However, these claims often fail to account for reduced course loads and alternative assessment methods that differ from standard requirements. Data indicates that fewer than 20% of college students with autism graduate or are even on track to do so within five years of high school.
The question of bias arises in research methodology. Studies yielding positive employment or educational results frequently rely on self-selected samples of higher-functioning individuals, potentially overlooking those who cannot participate in such surveys. The mounting evidence suggests that Kennedy’s unvarnished view of autism outcomes aligns more closely with reality than the more optimistic advocacy narratives.
Highlighting success stories while ignoring the broader statistics misrepresents the experiences of many on the autism spectrum. An honest acknowledgment of these realities may serve to redirect efforts toward understanding the factors behind the skyrocketing autism rates and seeking preventive measures.
"*" indicates required fields
