The House Budget Committee has launched early talks on a second Republican megabill, focusing on potential reforms to Medicaid, sources told Fox News Digital. As lawmakers return from their August recess, Republicans on the committee are expected to hold closed-door discussions in the coming days. Those familiar with the matter noted that these discussions would consider modifications to measures that did not pass in the Senate’s final version of the previous bill.
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) confirmed that the topic of discussion would revolve around “Medicaid reform,” suggesting that familiar issues would be revisited. “Same thing we debated before, same thing that we were fighting for,” Norman said. His statement underscores the ongoing debate within the party as they grapple with the challenges ahead. While discussing the appetite for reforms, he cautiously remarked, “I don’t know that the appetite is there right now, but we’ll see.”
Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), the House Budget Committee Chair, has also acknowledged the urgency of the situation. “Reversing the curse is a continuous effort when you’re $36-plus trillion in the hole,” he remarked, highlighting the gravity of the national debt. Arrington pointed out that tackling this issue will require more than a single reconciliation bill, indicating that discussions are already underway to establish a second package. The details of this potential package, however, remain fluid, with ongoing conversations among committee members and leaders of other House panels regarding the specific provisions to include.
When asked about the prospect of including Medicaid reform, Arrington expressed support for proposals aimed at blocking federal funding for certain medical procedures. “I’d be shocked if those don’t go back in, in some form,” he stated, referring to measures preventing funding for transgender medical procedures and prohibiting federal dollars from reaching undocumented immigrants. Arrington emphasized that these proposals align with public sentiment, saying they reflect what “80% of the American people would expect… are shocked that it’s not happening.”
Despite the focus on certain elements of Medicaid reform, Arrington suggested that more contentious proposals—like modifying the federal-state cost-sharing ratio for Medicaid, known as FMAP—might not take center stage in the upcoming discussions. This proposed change has generated division within the Republican party; while some members strongly advocate for adjustments, the broader consensus is less clear.
Republicans have long critiqued Medicaid as a program burdened by “waste, fraud, and abuse.” They argue that reforms are necessary to ensure that the most vulnerable receive the benefits they need. However, any new decisions regarding Medicaid policies will require input and approval from the House Energy & Commerce Committee, responsible for overseeing federal healthcare programs.
A spokesperson for the committee relayed that they have not proposed any specific policies for consideration in a possible second reconciliation effort. This uncertainty looms over the House as it recalls the lengthy, contentious negotiations that marked the passage of the first reconciliation bill, which focused on several priorities set forth by the prior administration, such as tax cuts and stricter immigration enforcement.
In July, the first reconciliation bill, which also imposed work requirements for some Medicaid recipients, was branded by its proponent as “one big, beautiful bill.” Despite advancing significant GOP goals, it faced serious backlash, with critics accusing Republicans of jeopardizing millions of Americans’ healthcare in favor of tax breaks for the wealthy.
As the party prepares to engage in discussions about another megabill, skepticism remains regarding whether both chambers are ready to tackle the intense negotiations required for effective reform. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has signaled that if a second reconciliation bill is pursued, it should aim to “cancel the healthcare cuts and save our hospitals.” He cited that Democrats would broadly support protecting healthcare funding, which adds another layer of complexity to the negotiations.
The reconciliation process itself allows the party in power to advance significant pieces of legislation while minimizing the influence of opposition. It lowers the Senate passage threshold from 60 votes to 51, but it can only be utilized three times during a single congressional term. With the stakes so high, lawmakers are carefully navigating this challenging landscape, seeking a balance that preserves both fiscal responsibility and essential benefits for Americans who rely on Medicaid.
"*" indicates required fields
