In May, The Gateway Pundit reported that President Trump urged Congress to quickly defund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). This call to action came after a House Oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing highlighted PBS and NPR’s obvious bias and controversial content. By July, the Republican-controlled Senate approved a Trump-backed rescission bill that cuts nearly $9 billion in federal spending, including a complete defunding of both organizations.
“Don’t miss this opportunity to rid our country of this giant SCAM, both being arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party,” Trump urged Republican leaders. This sentiment reflects growing discontent among some lawmakers regarding publicly funded media that they believe promote a left-wing agenda.
Following the passage of the rescission bill, PBS faced immediate financial consequences, as The New York Times reported that it planned to cut 15% of its workforce. This decision follows a $500 million loss in federal funding. Prior to these cuts, PBS had already frozen funding, paused pay raises, and reduced its budget by 21%. The atmosphere within PBS appeared grim. One employee, feeling the effects of the reduced funding, remarked, “It feels like the soul of public television is being gutted.”
The White House offered a sharp response to the situation. Spokesperson Liz Huston claimed that “the days of American taxpayers being forced to foot the bill for left-wing propaganda are over,” affirming Trump’s stance on responsible spending that benefits hardworking Americans.
PBS CEO Paula Kerger defended the organization against accusations of bias, claiming that critics often struggle to provide examples of left-wing content at PBS. In an interview with CNN, she stated, “People often struggle to come up with examples.” Yet the controversy continued to loom over PBS’s programming choices, which critics labeled as extreme and unaligned with mainstream American values.
Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana noted the appropriateness of questioning the funding of these organizations. “They have the right to say this stuff—but not with your money,” he emphasized, highlighting the concern many Republicans share about taxpayer dollars being directed toward programs deemed politically charged.
As August approached, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), an organization created by Congress to fund public media, announced it would begin winding down operations after losing $1.1 billion from its budget. This decision is expected to lead to significant staff reductions by September 30.
The cuts underscore a broader discussion about public funding for media. Critics argue that taxpayer money should not support outlets they perceive as biased. This sentiment has reached a boiling point, leading to significant changes in how public broadcasters operate and are financed.
The controversies surrounding PBS and NPR demonstrate a significant shift in priorities among some lawmakers. As funding dwindles, the path forward for these organizations remains uncertain, and they face increasing scrutiny over their programming choices.
"*" indicates required fields
