The unfolding saga surrounding Joe Biden’s use of an autopen for signing pardons raises serious questions about the legitimacy of his final acts of clemency. New internal emails reveal that Biden did not personally review the multitude of pardons he issued at the end of his presidency. This lack of oversight has prompted the Trump White House Counsel to dig deeper, calling into question whether Biden truly authorized these decisions or if they slipped through unnoticed.
David Warrington, serving as White House Counsel, emphasized the need for scrutiny in a memo addressed to Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. He stated, “We believe that answering the questions above requires interviewing those involved.” This inquiry intends to shine a light on the circumstances under which Biden’s pardons were executed. Warrington’s concern centers on the legality of the actions taken, urging that the Justice Department and Congress need to interview advisors to ascertain whether the autopen’s use was appropriate.
The controversy escalated with reports that the autopen, a machine designed to replicate signatures, may have enabled aides to implement clemency without direct input from the president. One White House lawyer aptly stated, “[Biden] doesn’t review the warrants.” This indicates a concerning trend where significant decisions may be delegated away from the president and left in the hands of staff members.
Emails obtained by media outlets underscore the disarray within the West Wing regarding Biden’s signing of pardons. In the lead-up to the mass grants of clemency, there was considerable tension as aides worked to ensure Biden’s intentions were accurately communicated. Yet the timeline reveals that while Biden verbally approved certain pardons, his official signature was not affixed until days later—after a vacation in St. Croix. Former White House Staff Secretary Stef Feldman voiced concerns about the need for evidence of Biden’s consent before finalizing the approval of over 2,500 pardons with a mechanical signature.
The Oversight Project played a pivotal role in revealing the depth of this scandal, finding that thousands of clemency actions were signed using the autopen rather than withstand the scrutiny of the president’s direct oversight. Biden defended the autopen’s use in a conversation with The New York Times, claiming, “I made every decision.” However, this assurance contradicts the findings suggesting he had limited knowledge of who was actually being pardoned, with staff simply sending the revised lists through the autopen without his explicit approval.
This entire situation raises alarming concerns about accountability and transparency in the highest echelons of government. With more than one million documents under review, the Trump White House Counsel is determined to uncover the truth behind what some have labeled the Biden autopen scandal. As this investigation unfolds, it could reveal critical information about how presidential powers were exercised, or possibly exploited, in the final days of Biden’s term.
The potential implications of these revelations warrant serious attention. If it is determined that the pardons lacked the necessary presidential endorsement, the legal authority of those decisions could be challenged. Critics have already voiced suspicions that Biden’s reliance on the autopen reflects a broader failure in governance, questioning the very autonomy of the presidency during his administration.
This investigation could reshape public discourse around presidential powers, particularly how clemency is granted. The continuation of this narrative surrounding the autopen will likely spark intense debates on accountability, transparency, and the true extent of executive power in America.
"*" indicates required fields
