The recent investigation into Burlington Public Schools by the Department of Education has stirred significant concern among parents, particularly regarding the district’s handling of the 2025 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). Parents are alleging that the school ignored their opt-out requests, compelling students to take a survey that includes sensitive topics. This investigation focuses on whether Burlington violated the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA), which empowers parents to exempt their children from surveys that may invade their privacy.
The YRBS, which was administered in March to students at Marshall Simonds Middle School and Burlington High School, covers a range of explicit subjects. These include drug and alcohol use, mental health, sexual activity, and gender identity. Parents had previously been informed of their rights to opt out, and many did submit written requests. Yet, reports indicate that the district permitted some students to take the survey against their will. In one instance, a teacher allegedly forced a student to participate despite the clear objections expressed by the parent.
Screenshots from the survey reveal its graphic nature. Questions ask students about sexual orientation, presenting options that range from “straight” to various identities such as “lesbian,” “gay,” “bisexual,” and “queer.” Similarly, inquiries on gender identity invite students to classify themselves into categories that include “cisgender” and “nonbinary.”
U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon responded strongly to this situation. She characterized the survey as “graphic and downright inappropriate,” echoing the frustrations of many parents. “Parents must be the primary decision-makers in their children’s education,” McMahon said in a statement. Her commitment to thoroughly investigate the matter suggests a prioritization of parental rights in education amid concerns around the school district’s policies.
Additionally, a letter from the Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center, representing concerned parents, outlines a troubling history of Burlington Public Schools allegedly promoting divisive ideologies. This complaint details how past actions, such as celebrating LGBTQ+ Pride and the use of gender-nonconforming pronouns by teachers, appeared to be implemented with little to no option for parental guidance.
The letter makes it clear that this is not an isolated issue. It accuses Burlington of systematically disregarding parental rights under the guise of inclusivity. For instance, the school has reportedly obscured the existence of LGBTQ clubs from parents and actively celebrated specific ideologies while stifling alternative viewpoints, such as pro-life sentiments. The parents’ grievances underline a broader concern about transparency and communication within the educational landscape.
The accusations demand serious accountability. The letter calls for comprehensive training on the PPRA for school staff and raises the possibility of disciplinary measures, including termination for those responsible for enforcing these controversial surveys. Superintendent Eric Conti has stated that Burlington will cooperate fully with the investigation and is committed to addressing any necessary changes to protect students’ rights.
This investigation highlights critical questions about parental involvement in the education system and the rights of parents versus the actions of school districts. As this situation develops, it remains to be seen how Burlington Public Schools will navigate the investigation and what implications it may have for educational policies regarding student privacy and parental rights.
Ultimately, this case serves as a clarion call for transparency and adherence to parental authority. It echoes a broader conversation about the role of parents in shaping their children’s educational experiences, particularly when it comes to sensitive topics that could impact their emotional and psychological well-being. The outcome may set a precedent that could resonate well beyond the boundaries of Burlington, Massachusetts, potentially influencing how other school districts across the nation approach similar issues.
"*" indicates required fields
