A Missouri pharmacist has raised concerns about the authenticity of President Joe Biden’s signatures on official documents. This revelation came shortly after Biden assumed office, underscoring broader anxieties surrounding the handling of presidential authority and the legitimacy of his executive actions.
The pharmacist, a seasoned observer of handwritten signatures, claims that Biden’s executive orders may not bear his true signature. In his initial approach to The Gateway Pundit, he noted, “I believe I have accidentally discovered his signature may be a forgery.” His observations hinge on a careful examination of multiple documents, where he identified consistent patterns in the signatures that suggest the use of an autopen rather than Biden’s own hand.
His line of work as a pharmacist has trained him to spot forgeries—skills developed over fifty years. “I can recognize authentic, live signatures,” he explained, emphasizing that while many signatures can change with age, their transformation is usually not wholesale. Biden’s purportedly shaky signature seems to have shifted drastically within a year, which the pharmacist finds strikingly unusual.
He pointed to the “B” in Biden as particularly revealing. According to his analysis, the way Biden forms this letter differs from the variations seen in the autopen signatures. “That ‘B’ is what is on the Autopen signatures,” he asserted. The contention is that it resembles Jill Biden’s signature more than Joe’s, leading to suppositions of possible collaboration in deceit.
The implications of such claims are significant. A signature is not merely a formality; it is a legal endorsement. Under facsimile laws, a forgery renders a document void. The pharmacist insists that if Biden’s signatures on critical documents were indeed forged, it poses a grave legal issue. “The concise point here is: it appears Joe Biden had a consistent signature before he was President, then different ones during his presidency,” he observed. His argument pivots around the assertion that the autopen signatures differ markedly from those signed in conjunction with Biden’s legitimate penmanship.
Further investigation by a handwriting expert corroborates the pharmacist’s suspicions. The expert noted, “I have searched exhaustively and can find no instance of Joe Biden signing his signature as it appears on the Autopen.” This statement supports the idea that the signatures used during Biden’s tenure have been misrepresented, effectively creating a divide between signatures bearing weighty legal implications and those that may not carry Biden’s authority.
Moreover, the pharmacist drew attention to the fact that the only two signatures he finds credible during Biden’s presidency were those on his resignation letter from the campaign and on the pardon for Hunter Biden. These authentic signatures reportedly capture Biden’s unique style, contrasting sharply with those produced by the autopen, reinforcing suspicions that he might not have been in control of his executive responsibilities.
As discussions on these findings ensue, questions about who truly exercises authority within the Oval Office are paramount. The fear that Biden’s use of an autopen might signal deeper issues of governance and regarding who makes critical decisions is particularly relevant today. The pharmacist highlighted this concern, stating, “I thought maybe I could head off a Constitutional crisis; now I think there is one.”
This situation opens the door for a far-reaching examination of the current administration’s integrity. If events unfold to support the notion that Biden’s document signing has been compromised, it could erode public trust in presidential actions. The implications of such findings may reverberate well beyond discussions of handwriting analysis; they could cast a long shadow on the legitimacy of Biden’s presidency.
In summary, this pharmacist’s insights into Biden’s signatures resonate with a broader skepticism regarding the authenticity and transparency of governmental operations. With calls for further scrutiny and expertise in handwriting analysis, the unfolding narrative is poised to challenge perceptions of presidential authority and legal legitimacy. The potential consequences of these revelations warrant careful consideration, as they may reveal uncomfortable truths about the current state of leadership in America.
"*" indicates required fields
