In a tragic turn of events, the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte has raised serious questions about the judicial system in North Carolina. Zarutska was killed on a light rail train by Decarlos Brown, a man with a lengthy criminal history who had been released from custody multiple times. This horrifying incident is prompting calls for accountability from the Republican House delegation in North Carolina, specifically targeting the judge who allowed Brown’s release.
The judge in question is Magistrate Judge Teresa Stokes. According to reports, she released Brown based solely on a written promise that he would appear in court again, despite his extensive background of criminal activity. This decision came after Brown’s 14th arrest. He had a history that included serious offenses such as robbery, physical assault, and illegal possession of a firearm. In fact, he was sentenced to five years in prison in 2014 for robbery with a dangerous weapon.
Members of the North Carolina GOP, led by Congressman Tim Moore, have demanded Stokes’ removal from the bench, emphasizing that her decision to release a known repeat offender directly contributed to a preventable tragedy. “This tragedy was preventable. There must be accountability,” Moore stated in a post on social media. The call for Stokes’ removal is framed under North Carolina General Statute § 7A-173(a), which allows for a magistrate to be removed for failure to perform their duties or conduct that harms the justice system’s reputation.
The delegation’s letter to the Chief Judge highlights the grave consequences of Stokes’ decision. They state, “Her decision has undermined public confidence in the judicial system and exposed the community to wholly preventable harm.” They describe the circumstances surrounding Zarutska’s murder as a profound personal tragedy, linking it directly to the judge’s actions in the case of Brown. Despite knowing of his violent past, Stokes opted to grant him release without imposing significant conditions.
The tragedy unfolded on August 22, 2025, just as Brown’s misdemeanor charge was pending. While riding the train, he violently attacked Zarutska, fatally stabbing her in the neck. This incident starkly illustrates the implications of judicial decisions that seem to disregard public safety. The urgency of this matter is reinforced by the fact that, according to the GOP delegation, Brown’s release should never have occurred in the first place. Their argument rests heavily on the notion that judges hold a sacred responsibility to protect the safety of their communities.
As calls for Stokes’ removal gain traction, they point to a troubling tendency within the judicial system to allow repeat offenders back onto the streets. The harsh reality is that the consequences can be life-altering, not just for victims but for entire communities. This incident serves as a painful reminder of the need for accountability in the judicial system, ensuring that the safety of the public is prioritized above leniency toward offenders.
Furthermore, the North Carolina GOP has asked for a comprehensive review of Stokes’ past bond determinations to fully understand the potential extent of her misconduct. This move is aimed at ensuring that those entrusted with judicial authority are acting diligently and responsibly. North Carolinians deserve to feel secure in the justice system, knowing that it will take necessary actions to protect them from violent offenders.
The implications of Zarutska’s death resonate deeply. It raises critical questions about how those in power make judicial decisions and the real-world effects these decisions can have. As the Republican delegation pushes for accountability, it highlights the urgent need for changes that will prevent such tragedies from occurring in the future. The hope is that by confronting these failures within the judicial process, communities can rebuild trust in a system that should be devoted to justice, safety, and the well-being of all citizens.
"*" indicates required fields
