Wayne Allyn Root’s recent piece on the assassination of Charlie Kirk is a bold and unsettling reflection of rising political tensions in America. Root paints a chilling scenario where the assassination attempt against Kirk serves as a harbinger of worse things to come. He argues that the shooter, labeled an “antifa-indoctrinated, leftist punk,” embodies a broader, more sinister mindset that threatens conservatives. According to Root, this incident is not isolated; rather, it signals a potentially escalating wave of violence from the left. He ominously states, “My gut says we are at a place in America where Charlie was the first, but he won’t be the last.”
The underlying theme of Root’s analysis hinges on the perceived moral decay and radicalization among segments of the left. He emphasizes that millions harbor animosity not just toward Kirk but also toward former President Trump and conservatives in general. This isn’t mere political dissent; it is indicative of a deep-seated desire for civil strife. He urges readers to recognize the extreme rhetoric and behaviors present in the current political climate. Reinforcing this notion, he notes how classrooms across the country reportedly celebrated Kirk’s death, stating that “students cheered the death of Charlie” and that there were teachers who “celebrated, laughed, [and] danced” in response to the event. Such claims alarm and galvanize the reader, painting a picture of a polarized society.
Moreover, Root underscores the willingness of various public figures—from judges to educators—to celebrate what he sees as a morally reprehensible act. He cites specific Halloween scenes of jubilation in the wake of Kirk’s death, framing those responses as part of a disturbing trend. “These are the people teaching your children,” he implores, pointing to what he perceives as a breakdown of civilized discourse. By invoking the atmosphere of chaos and jubilation on the left, Root amplifies his argument that no fair exchange of ideas is possible with those who harbor such intense hatred.
Root escalates this narrative by drawing direct parallels to past events, such as the attempted assassination of Trump. He pushes back against the notion of “both sides” being equally culpable in fostering this violence. He dismisses media claims about shared responsibility as false equivalencies, rejecting any implication that conservatives would support the assassination of their political opponents. Through a stark differentiation, he argues, “I may despise… but I don’t want them dead.” This assertion aims to bolster a sense of moral superiority over the left. In his view, there is a clear distinction between the political strategies of the right and the left, culminating in a call for political retribution rather than physical violence.
Root’s attendance at a candlelight vigil provided a platform for him to articulate a contrasting viewpoint. He advocated for political victories over violent retribution, firmly declaring, “The difference between us and them” rests in the approach to opposing views. He believes that instead of resorting to violence, conservatives should focus on their political adversaries’ careers. His call to action is clear: to “eliminate… politically” those he deems unworthy of power, framing this as a patriotic duty.
The concluding sentiment of Root’s commentary is foreboding yet motivating. He urges his audience to view Kirk’s assassination as a rallying cry for his side—to prepare for not just resistance, but decisive political warfare. He concludes with a rallying message to “destroy the evil demons on the left,” suggesting that such a struggle is about more than just political power; it is positioned as a moral imperative in the battle between good and evil. By invoking strong theological language, he significantly heightens the emotional stakes of his argument, seeking to unify his readers under a common cause.
Overall, Root’s analysis is a vivid illustration of his perspective on the current state of American political affairs. It calls out what he sees as a dangerous ideology at play among leftist radicals while simultaneously rallying conservatives to reject passivity. Root’s insistence on framing the political landscape as a battleground reflects a broader narrative strategy—one that seeks to inspire fervor and vigilance among those who align with his views.
"*" indicates required fields
