Steve Bannon delivered a scathing critique of Utah Governor Spencer Cox, laying the blame for the state’s issues squarely on the governor’s shoulders. On his show, War Room, Bannon did not mince words. He connected Cox’s leadership directly to the societal decay he sees as rampant, citing the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk as a critical example of the chaos. Bannon’s assertion is clear: Cox’s policies and ideologies are facilitating a dangerous environment for Utah’s youth.
In an impassioned call for accountability, Bannon accused Cox’s administration of failing to protect families and children. He described the governor as “weak-kneed” and argued that Cox had betrayed the very constituents he was supposed to serve. The charges were severe—Bannon described the practices of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) that Cox has embraced as part of a broader leftist agenda that undermines traditional values.
Bannon pointed to a specific incident in St. George, highlighting a tragic case where a young man murdered his parents and set their home ablaze. He listed this as just one symptom of a larger societal issue, insisting that Governor Cox’s leadership has enabled such acts of violence. “You’re just playing into it,” Bannon said, reflecting his outrage at Cox’s perceived shortcomings in governance.
Cox, viewed favorably by some media outlets for his measured responses to crises, attempted to frame his administration’s actions as a model of leadership. However, according to Bannon, this facade crumbles in light of facts. He stated flatly, “Cox is part of the problem,” as he laid out a case for an investigation into the governor’s connections with radical ideologies and actions.
Taking a historical perspective, Bannon drew comparisons between the current situation and past events where individuals overlooked signs of wrongdoing. He recalled how the roommates of the Boston Marathon bomber failed to inform police when they recognized their friend in footage of the attack, posing the question of how similar negligence could be allowed to occur in Utah today.
Bannon further criticized Cox’s handling of important societal discussions in Utah, particularly regarding educational policies. He claimed that instead of fostering a secure and principled environment, the governor has promoted a narrative that emboldens radical beliefs within youth culture. The rhetoric surrounding pronoun usage in schools and an openness to gender discussions was framed as detrimental to familial authority and traditional values.
As he pressed for accountability, Bannon emphasized the need for thorough investigations into Cox’s actions and his administration. He questioned why the federal authorities had not yet moved to address these concerns, stating, “The mother works for behavioral health. When you get into that thing, it’s a rat’s nest.” Bannon implied that these systemic issues run deep and could have been addressed if there were political willpower behind it.
Bannon’s narrative continued to outline a troubling trend of disillusionment, particularly among young men in America. He suggested that figures such as Charlie Kirk represented hope for a new direction, highlighting that Kirk’s assassination underscored the dire state of affairs. Bannon warned, “We’re looking for victory—not unity,” indicating a stark divide in how he perceives the path forward.
The focus on the educational system was a recurring theme in Bannon’s assessment. He argued that the power dynamic has shifted away from parents, who are pushed out of critical discussions about their own children. He bristled at the notion that empathy should replace parental authority, stating, “Is that okay with you guys?”
With visceral anecdotes, Bannon painted a picture of the decline of traditional values in youthful culture—a stark contrast to the brave young men who fought for freedom in previous generations. The image of a young man, uninspired and dressed in pajamas, symbolized a broader loss of potential. Bannon lamented, “Think of the perverted mind that would do that,” signaling a frustration with a society he believes has lost its way.
His closing remarks did not shy away from calling for immediate change, underscoring that without significant shifts in leadership and ideology, the societal fabric would continue to fray. His tone conveyed urgency, demanding investigations and accountability from those in power, particularly Spencer Cox. The insistence that such inquiries are necessary reflects a belief in the profound need for protective measures for the younger generation amid a rapidly changing cultural landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
