In a compelling episode from The Professor’s Record, former attorney and educator David Clements shines a light on the harsh realities of lawfare in America. Once a professor at New Mexico State University, Clements found himself without a position during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seizing the opportunity, he focused on exposing what he sees as unconstitutional government actions throughout that period and the issues surrounding the 2020 election. In this week’s episode, he dives deep into the challenges faced by pro se litigants—those representing themselves in court without legal counsel.
Clements paints a stark picture of the judicial landscape in America, describing it as “a cruel machine.” He likens the courtroom to a complex labyrinth where truth often falters at the hands of legal procedure. Pro se litigants, he argues, face an uphill battle. Without the protection of a lawyer, they navigate a system designed to overwhelm them. The courts become battlegrounds where skilled attorneys, armed with extensive resources, exploit the missteps of those who dare to stand alone.
“The system demands precision they can’t give,” Clements asserts, capturing the plight of individuals who struggle to meet the exacting standards of the legal process. Emotion, he notes, clouds rationality. Financial burdens mount as litigants grapple with overwhelming demands and complex jargon that often eludes their grasp. In this setting, the pursuit of justice becomes secondary to the fight for survival against a system weighted heavily against them.
Clements draws parallels between legal manipulation and a darker kind of power. He recalls wisdom from a pastor: “Witchcraft isn’t always potions or cauldrons. It’s any spirit seeking control, not truth.” This perspective highlights a troubling undercurrent in the legal system—one that prioritizes compliance with procedure over genuine justice. He expresses a troubling realization: the courtroom, like the altar, can be subject to forces more concerned with dominance than with truth.
As he explains, the legal landscape is steeped in cold legalism. The accusation becomes a weapon, wielded by attorneys in a ruthless quest for victory. Clements poignantly illustrates this dynamic, echoing stories of fathers fighting for the rights of their children, only to be met with dismissive responses about proper citation of statutes. He recalls the small business owner crushed by the weight of contractual minutiae—an all-too-familiar narrative in the world of law. “I’ve seen it. I’ve felt it,” he reflects, acknowledging the profound disillusionment many experience in their quest for justice.
The imagery employed by Clements is powerful. He describes himself as a pro se litigant, casting a vivid contrast between the uniformed, well-prepared nature of opposing counsel and the vulnerability of those who represent themselves. “Fear grips, but faith holds tighter,” he says, drawing resilience from his own experiences in a system that can often seem unforgiving.
For Clements, the parallels between courtroom battles and acts of spiritual warfare are striking. He sees judges donning robes as contemporary figures of authority, and legal briefs as modern-day spells. The act of oral argument, he argues, becomes a form of incantation. “Unopposed, the haggard clerk… etches a false record,” he warns, addressing how the truth can distort under heavy scrutiny and pressure.
This portrayal of the judicial process extends beyond mere grievance; it paints a portrait of an institution in need of scrutiny. The challenges that pro se litigants confront reveal a system that often rewards those with resources over those seeking justice. Clements urges listeners to recognize the reality that the scales of justice may not always balance as they should. His message sheds light on legal witchcraft that permeates the system, where rules are manipulated and truth is obscured.
In sharing his insights, Clements invites a conversation about the integrity of the legal system and the experiences of those who navigate it without the comfort of counsel. His account is not just a call to witness the struggles of individuals facing the judicial machine but rather a testament to resilience. In a world where the rules appear to govern more than justice, Clements stands defiantly, advocating for a truth that transcends the confines of legalese. Through his storytelling, he kindles a deeper understanding of what it means to fight for justice in a courtroom where the odds are often insurmountable.
"*" indicates required fields
