In a recent operation, the U.S. military struck Iranian nuclear facilities, reinforcing President Donald Trump’s warnings regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. General Jason Armagost, commander of the 8th Air Force, highlighted the operation’s significance, stating, “We reestablished deterrence, and all of our adversaries watched that.” This move is tied directly to Trump’s ultimatum to Iran, which he demanded progress on within a 60-day period. When it became clear Iran failed to meet this deadline, Armagost swiftly began preparing strike options.
Negotiations had been attempted between U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian representatives in Oman, but they reached a standstill over Iran’s insistence on maintaining a civil nuclear enrichment capability. After the expiration of the 60-day deadline, Trump emphasized, “They should have done it! Today is day 61.” It was clear the stakes were high, and the military was ready for a response.
The planning for the strikes involved meticulous detail, as Armagost described the operation as “far more expansive” than the actual execution. He noted the complexities of mission planning included not just the strikes themselves but also contingencies for additional actions. The B-2 bombers, capable of penetrating difficult targets, were employed to drop 14 large ordnance penetrators, specifically designed for deep underground targets. “Global operations are hard,” Armagost said, outlining the operational hurdles of different weather conditions and time zone challenges during the mission that took the crews over three time zones.
The impact of these strikes was felt almost immediately. Armagost reported that a ceasefire was established shortly after the attacks. He remarked, “Clearly the Iranians saw that, and saw the path forward had changed dramatically.” In response, Iranian leadership issued warnings of retaliation, yet the damage to U.S. facilities was minimal, and operations continued smoothly. This outcome was indicative of the U.S. military’s operational strengths, particularly in the emphasis on readiness and strategic deterrence.
While the military’s success is often evaluated based on precision, Armagost indicated that the true measure of success lies in the deterrent effect produced. This view aligns with the overarching goal of U.S. military operations: to project power and discourage aggression from adversaries. He noted, “Russia’s and China’s bomber forces are regional, not global.” This capability underlines the U.S. military’s unique position on the world stage.
Despite the successful operation, there are visible strains within the U.S. bomber forces. The decline in the number of long-range bombers from the Cold War era underscores the evolving challenges faced by the Air Force. Current plans include acquiring the next-generation B-21 stealth bomber to address future operational needs. “It’s a national-level discussion,” said Armagost, emphasizing the importance of strategic decision-making to ensure the country can project force against multiple adversaries in the years ahead.
In comparing this operation to pivotal historical moments, Armagost recalled the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He stated, “There’s about six weeks’ difference. Both were strategic attacks that changed history.” The implications of the recent operation are significant as they reaffirm the U.S. stance against nuclear proliferation, particularly with a regime known for its destabilizing behavior.
As the situation matures, the relationship between the U.S. and Iran remains critical, and the deterrent message from the military strikes is clear: the U.S. is committed to preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. “Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear weapons,” Armagost concluded, reinforcing the importance of ongoing vigilance and readiness.
"*" indicates required fields
