As the 2026 elections approach, a significant divide appears between the priorities of lawmakers and those of American families. Democratic leaders in critical battleground states seem inattentive, doubling down on controversial policies that threaten traditional values and the well-being of women and girls. A pressing issue has emerged: the push to allow biological males to compete in women’s sports.
Many families are preoccupied with everyday challenges… affording groceries, managing rising gas prices, and ensuring their children’s safety. Meanwhile, Democrats advocate policies that they argue support inclusiveness, but in reality, they risk undermining the very foundation of women’s athletics. This has sparked a robust debate centered not around hatred, as some might suggest, but rather around the principle of fair competition. Women’s sports were designed to provide a level playing field for those born female.
Polling data underscores a growing consensus among the populace. A Gallup poll revealed nearly 70% of Americans support competition based on biological sex. In fact, a troubling 75% of adults oppose allowing biological men to compete in women’s sports, with even two-thirds of Gen Z voters agreeing on this matter. Another poll by The New York Times/Ipsos suggests that this sentiment resonates with 79% of respondents. These figures indicate a widespread belief that biological males should not participate in women’s competitive environments.
The disconnect is stark. Elected officials such as Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia, former Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio, former Gov. Roy Cooper in North Carolina, and Gov. Janet Mills in Maine have seemingly ignored their constituents’ wishes, supporting policies that are at odds with the majority opinion. In Georgia, Ossoff voted against the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, despite a strong leaning towards such fairness within his state, as evidenced by the passage of the “Riley Gaines Act.” This move puts him at odds with the interests of Georgia families who support protecting girls’ sports.
Similarly, Brown’s actions reveal a troubling pattern. He voted to permit biological males in girls’ sports—a decision that directly contradicted the values of Ohio voters, who subsequently backed the SAFE Act, reinforcing protection for female athletes. Despite being rejected in the past elections, Brown continues to seek reelection, raising questions about his commitment to Ohio families.
The landscape is similarly bleak in North Carolina, where Cooper vetoed the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act. This legislation sought to ensure female athletes compete against those who share their biological sex. In a clear display of their disconnection, the state legislature overrode Cooper’s veto. In Maine, Mills went a step further by refusing to comply with federal guidelines aimed at preserving the integrity of women’s sports, risking substantial federal funding for educational programs to pursue a radical agenda.
Through these actions, Democratic leaders have aligned themselves with a fringe ideology antithetical to the desires of many Americans. While Democrats continue to push these divisive narratives, a shift is happening across the country. More states, including Indiana, Montana, and Nebraska, are taking action to protect women’s sports by reinforcing policies that prioritize fairness and biological realities.
The significance of this issue extends beyond sports… it captures a broader narrative about fairness and safety. Parents across the nation are voicing their concerns… they want their daughters, who dedicate immense time and effort to training, to compete on equal terms and feel safe in their environments. The current policy landscape raises questions about Title IX, a law designed to ensure equal opportunity in education and athletics. By ignoring the hard-fought battles women endured for fairness and the biological truths surrounding sex, politicians risk eroding this landmark legislation, effectively permitting biological males to encroach on women’s spaces.
Voter sentiment is shifting. Suburban families—once a key demographic for Democrats—are increasingly uneasy about the party’s stance on men competing against women. Falling in line with the Democratic party’s current position could cost them dearly in the upcoming midterms.
As the 2026 elections draw near, Democrats face a critical decision. They can either continue their allegiance to a radical ideology or acknowledge the overwhelming majority of Americans who champion fairness for women and girls in athletics. The stakes are high, and voters will have their say at the ballot box, making it clear that the battle for women’s sports and the preservation of daughters’ opportunities is a fight that resonates deeply with many. Failure to heed these concerns could lead to significant consequences for those who ignore this call for change.
"*" indicates required fields
