Election integrity is a pressing concern as the next cycle approaches, and a significant recommendation has emerged: the adoption of an Executive Order mandating rigorous controls akin to those established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in corporate America. This proposal aims to ensure that the processes surrounding U.S. elections are transparent, secure, and independently verified.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was introduced following major corporate scandals that exposed distressing flaws in financial accountability. Companies like Enron and WorldCom misled the public through deceptive accounting practices. SOX mandated that firms establish a reliable financial reporting framework, verified by independent auditors, to prevent fraud and protect stakeholders. Drawing a parallel to this, the proposal argues that U.S. elections require similar scrutiny.
Currently, the integrity of U.S. elections is at stake due to gaps in process controls. Lacking a mandate like SOX, many election systems operate with inadequate oversight. The article starkly notes that only one-third of necessary controls are in place. This raises alarm bells about the potential for fraud or error to affect election outcomes. “The U.S. election process is a disaster,” states the report, emphasizing the urgent need for reform.
The proposed Executive Order would require that every aspect of the election process—voter registration, verification, ballot handling, and vote counting—be properly managed and documented. Just as corporations must have effective controls tested annually, elections must adhere to strict documentation and auditing standards before any results can be certified. This would create a structured framework ensuring that elections are not merely managed but are subject to rigorous scrutiny.
Moreover, the proposal insists that independent auditors, free from political pressure, oversee these processes and confirm compliance with the laws governing elections. This independence is crucial; auditors must be protected from repercussions, ensuring that their assessments reflect the true state of election integrity.
The executive order draft outlines a clear scope of responsibility, reinforcing the authority of state legislatures to manage elections while holding them accountable for compliance with federal standards. It also specifies severe penalties for those who fail to adhere to protocols. Asserting the need for timely intervention, the draft indicates that all problems must be resolved at least a month prior to elections—ensuring that any discrepancies do not compromise the electoral process.
By emphasizing the importance of diligently testing and certifying election controls prior to each election, the proposal aims to bolster voter confidence. “It should be completed before every election,” the article highlights, marking a crucial shift toward prioritizing election integrity.
In summary, adopting an Executive Order with stringent mandates similar to those of Sarbanes-Oxley could transform the landscape of U.S. elections. It would bring a level of professionalism and accountability that many believe is sorely lacking. This necessary change could restore trust in the electoral system and, ultimately, the democratic process itself.
"*" indicates required fields
