Oberlin College, a small liberal arts institution in Ohio, has found itself at the center of controversy once again. Julia Xu, a student affiliated with the school’s Gender, Sexuality, and Attraction Initiatives, recently made headlines by expressing support for political assassinations in a social media post. This declaration followed the assassination of a prominent political figure, raising alarms about the increasingly aggressive rhetoric from some factions within academia.
Xu’s remarks, which included the phrase, “We need to bring back political assassinations,” have sparked outrage and concern. In her post, she ventured beyond mere criticism, asserting that not everyone deserved free speech and that “some people should be afraid to express their opinion in public.” This kind of statement calls into question the very foundation of civil discourse, where differing opinions should be expressed openly and respectfully.
Interestingly, Xu attributed her viewpoint to “learnings” about Mao Zedong, the iconic Chinese leader known for his authoritarian rule. She cited Mao’s belief that while people deserve free speech, it should not extend to “reactionaries and imperialists.” This selective view of free speech echoes the sentiments of those who prioritize ideological conformity over open dialogue, raising concerns about academic freedom.
After facing backlash, Xu reportedly issued an apology, claiming to feel “deeply remorseful” for her statements. However, the response from Oberlin College has been tepid at best. President Carmen Twillie Ambar issued a statement condemning political violence, asserting that it threatens safety and violates civil discourse. However, the college has not disclosed any measures aimed at ensuring the safety of conservative students on campus in light of Xu’s incendiary comments.
This is not the first time Oberlin has faced criticism regarding its handling of controversial issues. The college was involved in a high-profile lawsuit after a local business claimed it suffered damage to its reputation due to unfounded accusations of racism made by students. The outcome of that case resulted in a significant financial settlement that underscored the consequences of unchecked rhetoric on campus.
The lack of formal consequences for Xu raises questions about the institutional response to radical ideas and whether the college can maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all its students. With campus climates shifting towards increasingly polarized viewpoints, the challenge lies in upholding the principles of free speech while also protecting students from threats of violence, both physical and ideological.
Overall, the situation at Oberlin College points to a broader trend within many academic institutions where radical ideologies clash with the principles of open discourse. As debates intensify, the implications for student safety and the integrity of academic environments are issues that merit serious consideration.
"*" indicates required fields
