Under Xi Jinping, China is reshaping its governance deeply and decisively, moving further than any leader since Mao. Xi is building a model of social governance that combines Mao-era mobilization with modern digital surveillance. As he prepares for potential conflict with the U.S. over Taiwan, which he views as a crucial element of China’s revitalization, the nation is undergoing significant military, nuclear, and economic transformations. However, economic stability remains a major concern. President Trump’s trade wars have significantly impacted China, leaving Xi grappling with the repercussions.
China’s dependence on the U.S. market has made it vulnerable. As tariffs and restrictions redirect investment away from China to regions like Southeast Asia and India, the economic implications are profound. Analysts often focus on Xi’s firm grip over the military and economy, but social control plays an equally vital role. The realities of a potential war with the U.S. could lead to far-reaching adversity within China, such as conscription, rationing of essential resources, and a severe drop in exports.
China’s status as a net food importer puts it at risk of growing food insecurity during any conflict, where the army might be prioritized over civilians. Hence, Xi aims to prepare the populace to endure the repercussions of war and to align with the Party’s objectives. Drawing from past experiences, the necessity for public acceptance of sacrifices becomes apparent—mothers with empty stomachs accepting military losses, families in dimly lit apartments justifying suffering for the state. Historical lessons echo in the background, where threats of violence, secret police, and repression loom over dissenters. These tactics have occasionally been employed against groups like the Uyghurs, but widespread violence has been less common since the end of the Cultural Revolution. Instead, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has turned to voluntary enlistment in the national cause, seeking to persuade and indoctrinate its citizens.
In this effort, the CCP uses a narrative borrowed from U.S. political discourse. It presents itself as a protector of rights within the framework of its constitution, although that constitution is subordinate to Party authority. This framing offers citizens a sense of security under what the Party positions as a legitimate rule. Propaganda reinforces this notion, creating a perception that the Chinese political system is superior. In educational environments, abroad or at home, students hear pointed comparisons suggesting that China’s stability is preferable to the chaos seen in democracies.
Xi’s anti-corruption campaign stands as both a populist measure and a tool of political elimination. This ambitious campaign has initiated investigations into millions, with over 4 million officials scrutinized, and an extensive number prosecuted. Claims of safeguarding citizens’ rights frame the campaign, positioning the Party as a protector of the nation’s interests. Yet, while asserting an ideology of equality, the Party maintains a rigid hierarchy, easily casting aside rivals as ‘class enemies’ when needed.
Today, governance in China increasingly pivots around security, with the CCP claiming a commitment to law-based governance and public service. In contrast, this narrative intertwines with significant state surveillance and propaganda. The expansion of digital monitoring has allowed the Party to fit itself tightly into the daily lives of citizens. Recent years have seen the CCP intensify its focus on patriotic education, aiming to instill loyalty and readiness for sacrifice among the populace. Educational reforms stress patriotism from early childhood through higher education, capable of shaping students to embrace Xi Jinping Thought and national security as central tenets of their identity.
This patriotic zeal reaches beyond educational institutions into community organizations and businesses. The Ministry of State Security actively utilizes social media for anti-espionage campaigns, instilling a robust nationalist sentiment that heightens vigilance against perceived external threats. Collectively, these strategies strive to weave a sense of unity and discipline within the populace, preparing them psychologically for the Party’s future directives.
Xi’s governance strategy, marked by stringent social controls and an emphasis on patriotic loyalty, may well be critical to sustaining public support in tumultuous times, especially as tensions with the United States escalate. As history shows, the Party’s control over information and narrative will be paramount for maintaining stability amidst external challenges. The interplay of coercion and ideological persuasion continues to define the CCP’s governance, illustrating both the risks and the ambitions of a nation poised at the brink.
"*" indicates required fields
