A conservative political action committee has initiated a campaign aimed at exposing educators who have expressed support for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Stefano Forte, the executive director of the 1776 Project PAC, spoke with Fox News about this new initiative, highlighting a form on their website that allows users to report teachers and administrators who endorse Kirk’s killing. Forte noted that their efforts have already led to an “endless stream of tips.”
Forte’s statements underline a troubling situation. “Many people are essentially happy that Charlie Kirk has been killed. And these people are in charge of the next generations,” he asserted, drawing attention to what he sees as a growing disconnect in American education. This concern is echoed by conservatives online who are actively working to reveal the online hate directed at Kirk. Meanwhile, some elected officials and commentators on the left have accused conservatives of hypocrisy regarding free speech, a claim that Forte dismissed as “ridiculous.”
Forte insists that while individuals retain the right to express their opinions, there must be accountability for those who celebrate violence. “No one is saying they can’t talk. They can post whatever they want—but there are consequences,” he explained. He articulated a clear stance: if an individual applauds the murder of an influential figure, they should not be entrusted with educating children. It is not merely a matter of free speech; rather, it is about “judgment and character.” Forte’s remarks emphasize the gravity of having educators who may harbor malicious sentiments in positions of responsibility.
In the wake of the discussion surrounding Kirk’s assassination, social media has been flooded with posts from academic figures justifying or downplaying the incident. Notably, one administrator from George Washington University openly expressed that he felt it was “fair” that Kirk was killed, stating he had “no thoughts” and “no prayers” for the situation. Forte voiced his concerns about this mentality, indicating that such attitudes could extend to wider implications. “If you’re okay with Charlie Kirk being killed, then you’re likely okay with people who agree with him—or people further right than him—being killed too,” he stated.
The situation is serious, as it raises questions about the values taught to students. Forte emphasized, “That’s a serious problem.” By amplifying responses from those who openly celebrate violence, the 1776 Project PAC aims to make these educators’ views known. Forte pointed out that a Facebook post from the George Washington University official was “liked” and “loved” by many, including other academics. This response reflects what he describes as a deep-seated issue within some academic circles.
Forte characterized the pervasive celebration of Kirk’s assassination as symptomatic of a larger moral decay. He likened the current climate to a “rot” that is deeply entrenched. He cited far-left organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which have reportedly encouraged their members to openly acknowledge their views, suggesting a troubling comfort in the cancel culture they have fostered. “They’ve gotten so comfortable in the cancel culture they built that they assumed only right-wingers could ever get in trouble for speaking their mind,” Forte noted.
As educators prepare to influence the minds of future generations, the ideals they support and the values they impart become critical. The concerns raised by the 1776 Project PAC point toward a challenging landscape in American education. Documents like the newly launched form serve as both a warning and a call for vigilance among those who care about the integrity of academic environments.
"*" indicates required fields
