Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers is set to make waves by filing a lawsuit against Lorex, a home security camera manufacturer. This legal action, planned for Tuesday, accuses Lorex of misleading consumers about the safety and privacy of its surveillance devices. While not a household name, Lorex devices are available at major retail outlets like Costco and Best Buy, raising important questions about surveillance in American homes.
The crux of the lawsuit is a 39-page complaint filed in Nebraska state court. Hilgers argues that Lorex marketed its cameras as “private by design” and safe for use in sensitive areas, such as children’s bedrooms. However, the devices depend on technology sourced from a Chinese firm, Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co., which the U.S. government has sanctioned due to concerns over national security and human rights violations. Hilgers stated, “The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses a direct threat to American security, including through market actors who create or exploit security to American consumers.” This statement underscores the gravity of the issue, as it highlights both consumer safety and national security.
According to Hilgers, the Lorex 2K Dual Lens Indoor camera closely mirrors certain models made by Dahua. He emphasizes that Lorex’s marketing strategy fails to inform families of potential security and privacy risks associated with these products. “This marketing is deceptive, as Nebraskans are not warned about security risks,” he remarked. The focus on children’s privacy raises alarm bells, as parents trust these devices to safeguard their children’s spaces.
Hilgers is not alone in this battle. Michael Lucci, CEO of State Armor, has also raised concerns about the implications of Lorex’s actions. He voiced a strong sentiment: “Lorex products shouldn’t just say ‘Made in China,’ they should say ‘Watching from China.’” Lucci pointed out the dangers of misleading marketing tactics that mask the partnership with a CCP-controlled company. He rightly asserts that such omissions are not merely false advertising but constitute a direct threat to individual privacy and national security. His conclusion is clear: the lack of transparency regarding data security is alarming.
The lawsuit has broader implications, echoing concerns that lawmakers from both parties have expressed about China’s influence and espionage tactics within the United States. The increasing number of warnings about Chinese government activities in educational, research, and business contexts reflects deep-seated anxieties regarding national security. While the issue centers around Lorex, it opens a wider conversation about the need for vigilance regarding the products entering American households.
The legal action against Lorex is part of a growing recognition that technology from adversarial nations poses risks that must be addressed. As technology becomes a more integral part of daily life, consumers deserve to know precisely who is behind the products they rely on. This lawsuit is a critical step in ensuring accountability and transparency from companies that may unwittingly jeopardize the safety and privacy of American families.
"*" indicates required fields
