An appellate court is gearing up to make a decision that could have significant implications for abortion access in the United States. The case revolves around Planned Parenthood’s handling of Medicaid funds in Texas and Louisiana, potentially putting the organization on the line for up to $1.8 billion. The full panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit listened to oral arguments in this long-term dispute on Thursday.
Jennie Bradley Lichter, president of March for Life, stated, “The stakes couldn’t be higher.” Lichter emphasized that a favorable ruling for the plaintiffs could lead to financial ruin for Planned Parenthood, which operates hundreds of clinics nationwide. She explained the gravity of the situation: “Planned Parenthood is facing a repayment obligation of close to $2 billion because it continued to fill its coffers with taxpayers’ money even after two states had already disqualified it.” Lichter added, “If that obligation stands, it will strike a serious — even existential — blow to Planned Parenthood’s national operations and potentially change the abortion landscape in this country forever.”
This case traces back to the actions taken by Texas and Louisiana after activist David Daleiden released footage purportedly showing Planned Parenthood staff discussing the sale of aborted fetal tissue. Following this revelation, both states stripped Planned Parenthood affiliates of their Medicaid qualifications. Although Planned Parenthood initially won an injunction allowing it to continue receiving Medicaid reimbursements, a reversal followed years later.
The legal battles continued when an anonymous plaintiff filed a new lawsuit on behalf of Texas and Louisiana, aiming to reclaim the funds that Planned Parenthood had collected under the initial injunction. According to court documents, the total amount that Planned Parenthood could owe, including reimbursements and various multipliers, could reach $1.8 billion, although the exact figure will be determined in lower court proceedings.
At the heart of the case is whether Planned Parenthood held immunity when it collected Medicaid dollars over four years while the injunction was in effect. Planned Parenthood argues it acted under legal guidance, asserting that its counsel advised the organization to collect these funds during that period.
Susan Manning, general counsel for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, criticized the new lawsuit as politically driven. She expressed her organization’s stance, saying, “This baseless case has only one goal: to shut down Planned Parenthood and deny patients access to sexual and reproductive health care.” Manning further emphasized, “Planned Parenthood health centers are nonprofits that provide essential, high-quality health care to more than 2 million people nationwide every year.”
Simultaneously, this year has seen pro-life activists achieve some victories in their efforts to defund Planned Parenthood at the federal level. Congress made the decision to cut off Medicaid funding to the organization for a one-year period, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battle. Notably, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit ruled against Planned Parenthood in a related lawsuit concerning this funding measure.
As the 5th Circuit court deliberates the outcome of this case, both sides await a decision that holds the potential to reshape the landscape of abortion services in the country. The implications of these court decisions will not only affect Planned Parenthood but also the broader national conversation surrounding reproductive health and funding in the United States.
"*" indicates required fields
