Vice President JD Vance’s appearance on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” laid bare his critique of former Vice President Kamala Harris and her recent claims about her failed 2024 presidential campaign. He expressed astonishment at her comments, stating that her campaign wasn’t cut short but rather dragged on too long. “The more people know about Kamala Harris, the more they realize there’s no substance there,” Vance remarked, emphasizing the disconnect between Harris’s messages and the concerns of average voters.
Harris’s assertion that she lost due to limited time for her campaign raised eyebrows. Vance pointedly dismissed that idea, suggesting that the real issue stemmed from her messaging. “If you look at the polling, both the public and the private polling, the problem is not that Kamala’s campaign was too short; it’s that it was too long.” He proposed that had her campaign lasted longer, Republicans might have gained even more ground in the election.
The conversation turned towards Harris’s communication style, which Vance found lacking. He commented, “I listened to Kamala Harris for 90 seconds, and I actually feel like I’ve gotten dumber in the process.” This direct criticism reflects a broader frustration with Harris’s failure to convey clear viewpoints, opting instead for what Vance described as “word salad.” He argued that this lack of clarity prevents her from connecting with the public, a key element for any successful candidate.
In the wake of her campaign, Harris has faced scrutiny not only from opponents but also within her own party. Some Democrats have voiced their frustration, suggesting that her new memoir, “107 Days,” and subsequent media appearances have been “unhelpful and divisive.” This sentiment raises questions about the direction Harris is steering her political ambitions, particularly as her campaign strategies appear increasingly disconnected from voter concerns.
Harris’s criticism of the 2024 election as the “closest” of the century is also contentious, especially given historical comparisons that contradict her claim. Polling data reveals stark realities post-election, suggesting a dramatic downturn in voter support compared to President Joe Biden’s performance in 2020. Harris garnered “7 million fewer votes than Biden” and fell short in critical swing states, which signals a significant departure from the party’s past successes.
Media coverage of Harris has also highlighted her struggles. Criticisms have surfaced regarding her media engagement—or lack thereof. For much of her campaign, she faced backlash for not participating in enough interviews and failing to address pressing issues directly. Notably, her appearances were often characterized by vague responses that left audiences perplexed, further isolating her from the electorate’s priorities, such as the economy, inflation, and immigration.
As she attempts to recalibrate her image through media engagements, the scrutiny intensifies. An incident during an October interview on “60 Minutes” stirred controversy when segments of her responses were edited, prompting questions about transparency and authenticity. This decision ultimately undermined her credibility, as voters and opponents alike continue to question her forthrightness on key issues.
Overall, the challenges facing Harris seem to compound with each passing day. As she contemplates her next steps, there’s a mounting concern among observers that without a significant shift in her communication strategy, her political aspirations may be increasingly out of reach. For Vance and many others observing the political landscape, the certainty remains: clearer, more substantive engagement is crucial for connecting with voters and rebuilding support.
"*" indicates required fields
