President Donald Trump’s recent executive order has imposed a hefty $100,000 fee on new petitions for H-1B temporary workers. While this move is significant, it’s not without flaws. The communication surrounding the rollout was confusing, and the order does not prevent companies from using H-1B visas to replace American workers. Nonetheless, it represents a necessary initial stride toward reforming a system that has strayed from its original purpose.
The H-1B visa program was established more than 30 years ago to address a temporary labor shortage, but its scope has expanded dramatically, often at the expense of American workers. Understanding how the program went off track would require an entire report—one that is forthcoming. In the meantime, it’s important to acknowledge some of the core issues.
One of the primary criticisms of the H-1B program is its use by companies to substitute skilled American workers with less expensive foreign labor. According to available data, exceptions to the H-1B’s original annual cap of 65,000 visas have led to an explosion in usage. For instance, 20,000 additional visas were allocated for applicants with higher academic degrees, while many universities and research institutions have obtained cap exemptions. Furthermore, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has allowed the spouses of H-1B holders to work, complicating the issue further.
This isn’t just a theoretical problem. There is an abundance of American talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The United States generates more STEM graduates annually than the labor market can absorb. As one expert noted, only a fraction of STEM degree holders actually find work in their respective fields. While the H-1B program does attract some high-skilled workers, many recipients fall short of the high skills advertised. A notable observation from a professor in political science emphasizes that “the typical H-1B recipients are ordinary skilled workers” who can be sourced domestically.
Big-name companies like Amazon, Intel, Google, and Microsoft have come under fire for downsizing their American workforce even while hiring thousands of H-1B professionals. Critics point to this trend as more than mere coincidence; laid-off American employees feel the impact sharply. The “Misfortune 500,” a ranking by White Collar Workers of America, highlights the body shops that abuse the H-1B process most aggressively. In some extreme cases, American employees are required to train their foreign replacements before they leave.
Senators from both sides of the aisle have taken notice. In September, two prominent senators addressed an open letter to several tech CEOs, pressing them for transparency about their H-1B hiring practices. They articulated the common skepticism that there aren’t enough qualified American workers to fill the roles these firms are seeking to fill.
The original framework of the H-1B visa limited holders to a three-year stay, with a potential extension of up to six years. However, intricate loopholes allow foreign workers to obtain indefinite renewals if they fail to secure a green card due to statutory caps. This has led to a situation where foreign outsourcing companies can dominate the labor market, often hiring foreign workers at much lower salaries than their American counterparts. Data shows that over 70% of new H-1B applicants hail from India, with China holding the second position at just 11%.
Outsourcing firms such as Cognizant have exploited the H-1B loopholes effectively. They have petitioned for tens of thousands of new H-1B workers while employing discriminatory practices against American workers. Reports have emerged that being non-Indian significantly hindered job security within such companies, with documented cases of discrimination leading to lawsuits. Yet these firms continue to thrive and apply for new H-1B positions, often sidestepping American labor in the process.
The foundational salary minimum for H-1B workers was set at $60,000 during the 1990s and hasn’t been adjusted for inflation, raising serious concerns about fairness. Employers are required to attest that they will pay H-1B workers at least the prevailing wage, but numerous reports indicate that many positions pay considerably below the average salary for similar jobs. Major corporations have faced scrutiny for compensating H-1B employees less than their American counterparts, shining a light on potential exploitation of the system.
Moreover, the process for H-1B workers to transition to permanent residency has become notorious for its inefficiencies and abuses. As detailed in a report from the Department of Labor, many employers skimp on the advertisement of available positions to reduce the likelihood of attracting qualified American applicants. Instances of hefty fines levied against companies like Facebook (Meta) and Apple highlight the lengths to which some corporations have gone to manipulate job opportunities in favor of H-1B workers.
In light of rising unemployment among recent graduates entering the tech field, the influx of foreign workers competing for limited jobs becomes increasingly untenable. The imposition of a $100,000 fee on new H-1B petitions may significantly deter firms from exploiting this program, particularly the body shops that rely heavily on a system tailored for cheap labor. However, this measure alone may not resolve the myriad issues afflicting the H-1B program. It is crucial that further reforms are implemented to ensure that American workers receive not only the first opportunity but also fair compensation in their own job market.
"*" indicates required fields
