Climate activists have taken aim at President Donald Trump for his recent remarks at the United Nations General Assembly, where he labeled climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.” Yet, from the perspective of an environmental nonprofit leader, there may be more truth to his statement than critics acknowledge. The trust deficit between the American people and the modern environmental movement is profound, and it stems largely from the extreme tactics utilized by some in the movement.
Over decades, many activists have warned of impending doom, declaring that the world would end, yet their predictions have not come to pass. This repeated cycle has left the public skeptical, much like the adage of the boy who cried wolf. Now, dedicated conservationists, aiming to protect the nation’s natural beauty, face a barrage of skepticism as a result.
The language often used by climate extremists tends to instill fear rather than inspire action. The “my way or no way” mentality, coupled with attention-grabbing stunts… such as throwing soup on famous paintings or blocking roadways… has not garnered support. In fact, they have likely driven many away from the environmental cause.
In 1991, nearly 80% of Americans identified as environmentalists. Fast forward to 2021, and that figure has dropped to about 40%. Interestingly, the core issues surrounding the environment don’t fuel divisiveness. Instead, they enjoy widespread support across the political spectrum. For example, 82% of voters advocate for proactive forest management to mitigate wildfire risks. An impressive 87% want action to safeguard wildlife and habitats, while a staggering 95% understand the importance of clean water in lakes, streams, and rivers. The challenge lies not in public opinion but in reconciling the gaps created by extreme narratives.
The genuine solution to pressing issues… like increasing wildfire frequency, the Western water crisis, and devastating natural disasters… is not a reiteration of outdated approaches. It demands a reinvention of the environmental movement itself. Efforts must focus on common-sense solutions that resonate with the public rather than scare them.
The Trump administration has launched initiatives aimed at practical conservation. For instance, this summer, Trump signed an executive order to “Make America Beautiful Again,” establishing the MABA Commission, which aims to increase access to public lands and promote responsible resource stewardship. Additionally, the Interior Department has committed over $100 million to restore and conserve America’s wetlands. These are meaningful steps toward reshaping a new environmental movement.
Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency recently upheld a rule from the Biden era mandating that producers address contamination from enduring chemicals, known as “forever chemicals.” These are encouraging moves, but there remains much work ahead. A bipartisan approach to environmental concerns is essential. Conservation efforts should transcend political affiliations.
In some respects, Trump’s remarks resonate with reality. Indeed, nations will struggle if they adhere to the current trajectory that leans heavily on alarmist narratives. True leadership in environmental policy will emerge not from pessimistic predictions or impractical mandates… like electric vehicle requirements… but through sensible policies that uphold energy diversification and historic investments for ecosystem restoration. Efforts such as the Great American Outdoors Act and bolstered transportation systems reflect this need for balanced action.
A tangible, constructive shift in policy must align with a broader cultural transformation. While the modern environmental movement contains radical elements, the intrinsic value of nature has always remained a unifying theme. Amidst the many divisive issues, the natural splendor of America has potential to unite. Protecting the nation’s most beautiful landscapes is a Patriot’s duty; it serves as a source of national pride for all. Thus, the call for an environmentally conscious movement must change its tone from one of despair to one of empowerment and action.
"*" indicates required fields
