In recent developments, President Donald Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth announced measures aiming to dismantle Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs within the military. Back in January, Trump signed an executive order to eliminate DEI performance requirements across federal agencies. Hegseth echoed this sentiment in April, declaring, “DEI is DEAD at DOD.” His statements sat at the forefront of an ongoing debate surrounding the future of such initiatives within government structures.
However, Dr. Rick Addante, a neuroscientist and former psychology professor, has raised alarm bells regarding the reality on the ground. In what he calls an “undercover compilation,” Addante presented evidence revealing that DEI efforts remain very much alive, specifically in academia. He highlighted a video showing a university president from Florida Tech discussing strategies to bypass federal regulations against DEI programs. This revelation suggests that, despite official claims, institutions may be continuing these programs covertly.
Addante’s warnings are not unfounded. He argued, “DEI is clearly being laundered back into the Department of War, with academia serving as a Trojan horse.” His concern centers on the financial and ideological implications of using federal funds to educate military personnel while promoting ideologies such as Critical Race Theory (CRT) and DEI. He pointed out the discrepancies between programs claiming compliance with the executive order and their actual practices.
His personal experiences lend him added credibility. After confronting these issues, Addante was removed from his tenured position and allegedly offered $96,000 to remain silent about the DEI practices at his former university—a move he rejected in pursuit of transparency. He stated, “You can get rid of all the PowerPoints that include the words DEI and all that nonsense,” but cautioned against thinking that simply reshuffling personnel would eliminate the ideologies entrenched in academic institutions. He emphasized, “The enemy is within.”
This tension raises critical questions about the ideologies instilled in future military leaders. “How can you expect military personnel and students who are being taught to hate America to defend the nation?” Addante asked, stressing that the ramifications of unchecked DEI teachings could pose an existential threat to military readiness. He posited that if these teachings persist, they compromise the integrity and mission of the Department of War, as federal funds are utilized to support institutions that propagate divisive ideologies.
Moreover, he pointed out that the impact reaches beyond education to vital sectors like clinical psychology, which serves military personnel facing trauma, grief, and other mental health issues. Addante asserted that the field often lacks practitioners who can effectively relate to soldiers’ experiences due to the prevailing ideological slant within the profession. He stated, “The field is 85 percent woke, white women who are somehow supposed to understand our warriors in need.” This situation highlights the potential disconnect between mental health providers and the very individuals they are meant to support.
Addante’s proposals for addressing these challenges suggest further scrutiny is needed. He proposed instituting an oversight mechanism, potentially by appointing a “DEI czar” to audit compliance among universities receiving military funding. He believes that simply eliminating overt references to DEI might not be sufficient, as institutions may continue to operate under the radar, pushing ideologies they claim to have discarded. “They’ll lie to keep the millions of dollars of federal assistance from the government,” Addante emphasized, urging for accountability where it currently appears lacking.
The implications of Dr. Addante’s insights extend into the broader discourse on military readiness and influence from civilian educational systems. As military academies and training programs grapple with these issues, the challenge remains: how to ensure that U.S. forces remain dedicated to defending the nation without the interference of potentially divisive ideologies.
In conclusion, while the executive order and statements from the administration signal a clear intention to eliminate DEI initiatives, Dr. Addante’s revelations prompt a deeper examination of the effectiveness of such measures. As the ongoing clash between ideological education and military preparedness intensifies, the stakes are high for the future of America’s defense forces.
"*" indicates required fields
