California’s FAST Recovery Act, championed by Governor Gavin Newsom, aimed to revolutionize the fast-food industry by raising the minimum wage for workers. The rhetoric surrounding the law promised equity and a better standard of living. However, two years later, the outcome tells a different story. Instead of elevating livelihoods, the law has led to significant job losses. According to the Washington Examiner, the Employment Policies Institute reports nearly 20,000 fast-food jobs vanished in California since the law was enacted, representing a shocking one-quarter of all fast-food job losses nationwide.
This trend highlights a critical failure in policy-making that elevates virtue signaling over economic reality. Franchises like Pizza Hut responded to increasing labor costs by laying off 1,200 delivery drivers. Other chains, including Mod Pizza and Foster’s Freeze, found themselves unable to sustain operations, resulting in permanent closures. Rather than the protective measure that was sold to the public, Newsom’s mandate essentially priced many workers out of their jobs.
Rebekah Paxton from the Employment Policies Institute was blunt about the situation. She stated, “Newsom’s $20 wage has turned out to be nothing more than a boost to his own ego at the expense of fast-food workers.” While Newsom celebrated the implementation of the law, the harsh truth is that each lost job means a family struggling to make ends meet. Even workers who managed to keep their positions have seen a decline in their working hours, losing an estimated 250 hours annually or about $4,000 under the previous wage structure.
This is the cruel irony of the situation. Newsom touted the law as a means to secure “living wages,” yet the reality for many workers has been reduced hours and lower earnings. The American Cornerstone Institute pointed out that small businesses bear the brunt of these mandates, as they lack the financial cushion to absorb increased labor costs unlike multinational giants. This regulatory burden results in more small businesses folding and a greater concentration of market share within a few large corporations.
The Institute warned, “Unlike their multinational competitors, small businesses have a tougher time absorbing the increased costs of labor, leading to further consolidation of capital in the hands of the largest corporations.” They highlighted the absurdity of a one-size-fits-all wage policy across a diverse state like California. For instance, the cost of living in urban centers like San Francisco is immensely higher compared to rural areas, creating economic disparities that a fixed wage rate fails to address. Mandating the same wage throughout the state ignores these local economic conditions, which can lead to severe distortions.
Ultimately, the FAST Recovery Act appears less about empowering workers and more about political posturing. Critics warned that the law would produce adverse outcomes, and unfortunately, they have been proven correct. An “I told you so” won’t undo the job losses that stem from this misguided approach to economic intervention. For many families, the repercussions of Newsom’s policies will be felt long after the headlines fade.
"*" indicates required fields
