In the evolving political landscape of Virginia, former Representative Dave Brat has raised alarms about the prevalent “politics of rage” reflected in recent comments from Democratic leaders. Brat, now vice provost at Liberty University, believes this volatile rhetoric has created an environment ripe with threats against conservatives, showcasing a troubling shift in political discourse.
He cites remarks made by former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor, who told supporters to “let your rage fuel you.” This incendiary call to action comes amidst an already heightened atmosphere following serious violent threats against figures such as President Donald Trump and Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. In a recent interview, Brat voiced his concerns: “What I see happening in Virginia is concerning. You can’t ignore the connection between such rhetoric and the threats we are witnessing.” His words paint a grim picture of the current political climate.
Spanberger, under scrutiny, has attempted to temper interpretations of her remarks by affirming her condemnation of violence. Through a spokesperson, she asserted her stance: “I will continue to condemn comments that make light of or justify violence of any kind – full stop.” Nevertheless, Brat remains skeptical, pointing to the underlying motivations of political movements and how their rhetoric can incite real-world consequences.
Brat further elaborates on the psychological elements at play, noting that issues like transgender rights have become divisive and have sparked significant debate in schools and public discussions. “We believe in protecting the rights of all people. Life, liberty, pursuit of happiness for everybody,” he stated, while underscoring the historical significance of the Judeo-Christian principles in shaping rights as we understand them today. “That’s now what’s at stake,” he added, highlighting a growing concern among conservatives that traditional values are under siege.
The recent spike in death threats against lawmakers, exemplified by threats against Del. Geary Higgins and Del. Kim Taylor, emphasizes a rising tide of aggression that some believe is driven by politically charged hostility. Higgins reported being threatened at a rally after defending GOP gubernatorial nominee Winsome Earle-Sears, who endured racist attacks during a recent protest. “It’s alarming to see this kind of anger manifest itself so directly,” said Higgins, reflecting a sentiment shared by many in the Republican ranks.
Brat elaborates on the left’s tactics, illustrating how they manipulate perceived grievances to portray conservatives as “judgmental, bad people.” He pointedly remarks, “When minority groups behave like they’re the majority and force controversial material into education—especially for kids—we oppose that.” He dissects the rhetoric surrounding transgender issues, stating that the left’s embrace of “rage” is both a political strategy and a means to rally their base.
“For me, it’s just obscene that they use vulnerable groups as political tools,” Brat said, criticizing the left’s approach to political discourse. The resurgence of conservative principles and the acknowledgment of minority rights, he argues, lays a stark contrast to how those rights have been framed during much of the modern political narrative.
Reflecting on his time in office, Brat identifies a significant transformation in the conservative movement over recent years. He pointed out that what was once seen as a fringe effort has now developed into a significant force within the GOP, notably evident through the “MAGA revolution.” This evolution has drawn a clear distinction between the old guard of the party and the new wave of conservatives who advocate more fervently for their values. “There’s been a MAGA revolution,” he stated, noting the shift in how conservatives have gone from being outsiders to holding considerable sway within the political landscape.
Brat recalls interactions with politicians across the aisle, including former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who recognized the new generation of conservatives during his tenure. He described how Gabbard would engage with them, finding their perspectives refreshing amidst a landscape dominated by traditional party lines. His experiences highlight a key moment in political evolution where new voices began to emerge as crucial players in shaping the narrative.
As he analyzes recent events, Brat draws parallels between today’s challenges and those faced in the past, particularly after 9/11 when a sense of nationalism surged. He suggests that the assassination of public figures like Charlie Kirk has rekindled a level of political tension that voters will remember well beyond the immediate shock. “Kirk’s murder, among other threats, is likely to resonate in the minds of the electorate,” Brat warned, suggesting that this incident could have a lasting impact on voter sentiment in Virginia and beyond.
Brat reflects on the unique position that Kirk held, combining faith with a commitment to constitutional principles. “Charlie represented a fusion of faith and reason, which is what universities should foster,” he asserted, highlighting the potential shift in political dynamics as younger generations seek out leaders who embody these values. “If that resonates with voters now, we could see some surprising outcomes in Virginia,” he concluded, leaving the door open for speculation on the future of the political landscape in the state.
"*" indicates required fields
