Virginia’s political scene is in disarray following the emergence of troubling messages from attorney general candidate Jay Jones. Texts exchanged on August 8, 2022, reveal a disturbing mindset that even some of his staunchest supporters find unacceptable. Jones expressed his outrage over tributes to the late Joe Johnson Jr., a respected centrist Democrat, in a series of messages that have sparked outrage across the political spectrum.
According to reports, Jones mocked GOP tributes to Johnson, describing them while threatening a visceral act at their funerals: “If those guys die before me, I will go to their funerals to piss on their graves.” This comment alone raises questions about Jones’ suitability for public office. It reflects a blatant disrespect for both his colleagues and the values of civil discourse expected in political engagements.
The gravity of his rhetoric escalated further. In an unsettling hypothetical scenario, Jones stated he would prefer to kill a Republican Speaker of the House rather than historical figures like Hitler and Pol Pot. “They must feel pain themselves,” he said, suggesting that personal suffering would lead to political alignment.
Jones didn’t just stop at mere threats. His wish for the wife of his political opponent to endure the pain of losing a child as a means of pushing that opponent leftward is deeply disturbing. In his own words, he hoped Gilbert’s wife could “watch her own child die in her arms” to understand political pain. Such comments are not only reckless but disturbingly malevolent.
Even the far-left media found the comments too egregious, leading Joe Scarborough of MSNBC to declare, “He should probably be forced to withdraw from the race.” This consensus from a network generally sympathetic to Democratic causes marks a significant moment. If political rhetoric has reached a place where even the media is alarmed, candidates and voters alike should take note.
Jones sought to mitigate the fallout with an apology, saying he is “deeply, deeply sorry.” However, he failed to clarify whether his remorse stemmed from wishing violence upon a lawmaker or from the backlash that now grips his campaign. This ambiguity raises questions about his judgment and sincerity.
In a world where political civility ought to reign, Jones’ comments stand out as a stark violation of basic decency. They reflect a broader trend of incivility that does a disservice not only to opponents but also to the voters who expect professionalism from their leaders.
The incident underscores a vital reality in politics today. As candidates navigate their campaigns, they must remember that words carry weight, and violent ideation has no place at any stage of public service. Virginia voters will have to consider whether Jones can be trusted to represent them in a lawful, respectful manner.
"*" indicates required fields
