ESPN host Paul Finebaum finds himself at the center of controversy after expressing interest in running for the U.S. Senate. This week, he was reportedly pulled from the network following a discussion about his potential candidacy as a Republican in Alabama. OutKick’s Clay Travis noted on X that Disney and ESPN have canceled all of Finebaum’s appearances, including long-standing spots he has held for over a decade.
At 70, Finebaum has not officially declared his candidacy for Alabama’s open Senate seat in 2026, currently held by Tommy Tuberville. However, his comments about political interest have sparked major repercussions. He revealed in an interview that while he initially brushed off the idea of running, a conversation with a political figure changed his perspective. “I was very cautious, I didn’t take it too seriously,” Finebaum said. “And then, ultimately, I ended up talking to someone who made it clear that there was a desire for me to be involved.” This underscores how peer influences can shift one’s outlook on political engagement.
Finebaum’s links to politics don’t end there. He shared that he voted for Donald Trump and had plans for a significant interview with him in 2019, which was ultimately quashed by his employer. “I called my boss and they killed [the story]. I was devastated,” he said. The network had a clear mandate against blending politics with sports, an enforcement Finebaum found frustrating given the political climate surrounding sports today. When pressed about whether he would have faced the same limitations if he had sought an interview with Barack Obama, his response was pointed: “Well I think the answer’s pretty evident.”
Travis’s commentary on Finebaum’s situation highlights a sense of double standards within ESPN. He pointed out that other prominent figures, like Stephen A. Smith, have entertained political ambitions without facing similar backlash. “ESPN’s @stephenasmith has discussed running for president as a Democrat and the network has taken no action in this matter,” Travis noted. This apparent disparity raises questions about the network’s approach to differing political ideologies among its employees.
The issue is further complicated by recent controversies involving other figures on the network. Travis referenced the return of ABC host Jimmy Kimmel after a brief suspension for misleading comments about Charlie Kirk, drawing attention to how political affiliations may influence the treatment of personalities at Disney-owned networks. “The left wing rallied around Kimmel’s free speech rights in that case,” he remarked. With such examples, the question remains: will similar support circle back to Finebaum?
Despite the turmoil, ESPN’s spokesperson dismissed OutKick’s report as “TOTALLY FALSE.” The network confirmed that while Finebaum was not seen on “SportsCenter” last Sunday, he did appear on a different platform, hinting at a more complicated status than initially reported. Finebaum’s standing with ESPN appears murky at best, as the network has not provided further clarification on his future.
In this shifting landscape, one thing is clear: the intersection of sports and politics is becoming increasingly fraught with tension. How networks navigate this terrain will have lasting implications for both their employees and their viewers. Finebaum remains a prominent figure in college football commentary, but as he delves into the political arena, the supports and restrictions he faces will likely continue to make headlines.
"*" indicates required fields
