In a contentious exchange on Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the Trump Administration will appeal a ruling from Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, who issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against deploying the Oregon National Guard to Portland. Leavitt defended the President’s position against questioning from CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, indicating that the President views his deployment of the guard as necessary in light of ongoing unrest.
Judge Immergut criticized Trump’s actions, suggesting they could lead to a constitutional crisis. In response, Trump expressed his disappointment, claiming, “I wasn’t served well by the people who picked the judge.” He further denounced conditions in Portland, describing the city as “burning to the ground.” Such dramatic imagery underscores the severity of the situation as Trump explained that it warrants the intervention of the National Guard. “You have agitators, insurrectionists… it’s burning to the ground,” Trump stated, highlighting what he perceives as lawlessness that local leaders cannot manage on their own.
Leavitt argued that the federal government has a responsibility to act when local officials fail. “I think her opinion is untethered in reality and in the law,” Leavitt asserted, addressing the judge’s ruling. She also pointed out that the ongoing violence against federal buildings in Portland justifies the National Guard’s deployment. Citing incidents of aggression against law enforcement and attacks on federal facilities, Leavitt insisted that immediate action is necessary to restore order.
The press secretary emphasized that previous federal responses, like sending the National Guard to Los Angeles, have been upheld by the courts, demonstrating the administration’s legal authority. “We are appealing that decision… we’re very confident in the president’s legal authority,” Leavitt stated, confident that the appeal will align with the law.
Collins, however, pressed Leavitt on claims made by local officials in Portland who have reportedly stated that the National Guard is not necessary. Leavitt challenged this narrative, suggesting that local officials are partisan Democrats opposed to the President’s policies. “You should talk to the people who live in Portland,” she urged, indicating that many community members feel differently about the unrest. Leavitt noted that those who live in the city are struggling with “complete civil disobedience” and emphasized the chaos resulting from the ongoing protests.
In her rebuttal to Collins’ inquiries, Leavitt urged for an accurate portrayal of the situation, inviting the journalist to witness it firsthand. She underscored the risk posed to journalists, noting that independent reporters have documented violent actions by rioters. “You should play it on your show,” Leavitt challenged Collins, pushing for broader media coverage of the turmoil affecting Portland.
This exchange reflects the ongoing divide about the administration’s methods for dealing with unrest in cities across the country. With the stakes high, both the Trump Administration and local officials are navigating a complex landscape of legality, public opinion, and safety as they address the persistent unrest. The dialogue embraces a key question: who has the authority to act in times of crisis?
As the appeal progresses, the implications for law enforcement and community safety in cities facing similar challenges remain significant. Leavitt’s assertion of the administration’s position echoes the sentiment that federal intervention is sometimes necessary when local governments are overwhelmed.
"*" indicates required fields
