New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill declared on Monday her intention to take legal action against the Trump administration should President Trump attempt to send National Guard troops to the state. Sherrill, a Navy veteran and federal prosecutor currently representing New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, articulated her stance during a town hall event broadcast live on Univision 41 Nueva York. An audience member, who had fled Venezuela under Nicolás Maduro’s regime, inquired about Sherrill’s response if federal troops were deployed to New Jersey.
“American troops should not be on the streets of our country,” Sherrill warned, emphasizing that the military is unprepared for policing techniques essential for maintaining public peace. She specified that deployment should only occur during extreme situations such as insurrections or national emergencies. Sherrill’s position underscores her belief that troops serve a different purpose than local law enforcement, stating, “Should Trump try to deploy troops on our streets, I would be very opposed to that.”
As Sherrill campaigns against Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli to succeed term-limited Democratic Governor Phil Murphy, her remarks reflect a broader context of federal troop deployments under the Trump administration. Since returning to office, President Trump has either issued or threatened deployments to multiple cities he deems plagued by crime. This has drawn criticism from various officials, who argue that such federal intervention can exacerbate tensions rather than alleviate them.
The situation extends beyond New Jersey. For instance, the state of Illinois is also engaged in a legal battle against the Trump administration in an effort to prevent the dispatch of National Guard troops to Chicago. This lawsuit follows a prior court ruling that found the Trump administration acted unlawfully when deploying the National Guard to assist with protests in Portland, Oregon.
Sherrill’s comments resonate with sentiments expressed by those wary of a heavy-handed federal presence. The Trump administration defends its actions by claiming they are necessary for restoring order. However, critics argue that placing troops in domestic situations can inflame public unrest and compromise safety.
Sherrill’s proposal to challenge such deployments speaks to the growing concerns over federal overreach. As she positions herself against Ciattarelli in a state that has maintained Democratic leadership for years, her stance may bolster her appeal among voters concerned about maintaining local autonomy and public safety in New Jersey.
As the campaign unfolds, Sherrill’s legal promise against troop deployments reflects her commitment to protecting the interests of New Jersey residents and highlights significant differences in governance approaches between herself and her Republican opponent. The outcome of this race may ultimately hinge on how voters perceive the balance between law enforcement and military intervention in civilian life.
"*" indicates required fields
