Recent developments have brought attention back to Vice President Joe Biden’s controversial trip to Ukraine in December 2015. A newly declassified CIA report adds weight to the narrative surrounding Biden’s actions and raises questions about the motivations behind his visit. The context is rooted in the dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company.
In May 2023, it became evident through communications revealed by The Gateway Pundit that Hunter Biden secured a contract with Blue Star Strategies, a firm linked to Clinton ally Sally Painter. Emails from late October to early November 2015 outline plans to improve the legal situation for Mykola Zlochevsky, the CEO of Burisma. In one significant email dated November 2, 2015, Vadym Pozharskyi, an executive at Burisma, expressed concerns over the effectiveness of the proposed contract. He emphasized the need for “concrete tangible results” and a list of “high-ranking U.S. officials” to advocate for Zlochevsky’s interests.
During this period, Joe Biden had already made headlines for boasting about withholding a $1 billion loan guarantee from Ukraine unless then-prosecutor general Viktor Shokin was fired. Although Biden did not publicly refer to Shokin in his speeches, the implications were clear. The CIA report revealed that Ukrainian officials felt disappointment and confusion regarding Biden’s intentions during his trip, anticipating more meaningful discussions than a “generic public speech.”
According to the report, upon returning from this trip, Ukrainian officials pondered the troubling nature of Biden’s ties to his son’s business dealings. They noted a “double standard” in perceptions of corruption between the U.S. and Ukraine. This sentiment aligns with snippets from Hunter Biden’s emails, which indicate strategic planning regarding high-profile U.S. endorsements to bolster Burisma’s image in Ukraine. The term “generic speech” seems to encapsulate Biden’s approach—a facade masking a deeper agenda tied to his family’s business interests.
The CIA report serves as a pivotal piece of evidence that brings clarity to accusations of corruption that have surrounded Biden’s tenure as Vice President. The crux of the matter rests on whether Biden used his office to assist his son’s business ventures, notably through coercive diplomacy under the guise of foreign aid. The existence of emails expressing desired outcomes from Biden’s visit raises significant ethical questions about the intersection of family interests and political power.
As this story continues to unfold, it spotlights the intricate web of influence peddling and the implications of personal relationships in the highest offices of government. The Biden administration faces mounting scrutiny as these allegations link back to serious questions about accountability and propriety in leadership roles.
"*" indicates required fields
