Chicago, Illinois, has become a focal point for the discussion surrounding immigration policy, especially under the governance of Democratic leaders. The city’s approach is clear: prioritize the needs of illegal immigrants over those of its legal residents. Mayor Brandon Johnson and Governor J.B. Pritzker exemplify this trend, which has developed over decades.
The roots of this policy can be traced back to 1985 when then-Mayor Harold Washington implemented an executive order banning city employees from inquiring about immigration status. This marked the beginning of a series of protective measures for undocumented immigrants. In 2012, Mayor Rahm Emanuel expanded upon this concept with the “Welcoming City Ordinance,” effectively turning Chicago into a sanctuary city. This law not only barred city employees from informing on a person’s immigration status without a court order but also fostered an environment of protection for illegal immigrants.
Fast forward to 2021, when Mayor Lori Lightfoot intensified these measures. She declared that police could no longer detain or arrest individuals based solely on their immigration status. This directive has raised significant concerns about public safety, as it hindered law enforcement’s ability to cooperate with federal immigration agents. Under this new policy, even criminals could not be handed over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation based on their immigration status or civil warrants.
The reluctance to collaborate with federal authorities has been highlighted in recent actions by the Chicago City Council. In January, they blocked a proposal that would have allowed police to engage with federal agents concerning gang-related crimes. The measure could have led to the apprehension of undocumented individuals involved in criminal activities, but the proposal was shut down. Johnson has since initiated campaigns aimed at informing illegal aliens of their rights while previously attempting to secure work permits for them, highlighting the administration’s focus on catering to non-citizens.
Moreover, Johnson’s administration has taken bold steps to redefine Chicago’s relationship with federal immigration enforcement. The city is now considered an “ICE-free zone,” a designation that positions it in stark opposition to federal immigration laws. With an approval rating of a mere six percent, Johnson faces growing discontent from residents who feel unsafe amid these policies.
Pritzker’s comments about national figures reflect a tendency to sidestep pertinent issues. His comparison of former President Trump to Adolf Hitler underscores a divisive strategy that detracts from addressing Illinois’s crime and immigration challenges. Statements such as these, particularly amidst the ongoing crime crisis in Chicago, incite anger and frustration among residents who yearn for effective governance.
This disregard for federal immigration statutes has historical parallels, as illustrated in Victor Davis Hanson’s 2021 book, “The Dying Citizen.” He draws comparisons between sanctuary cities and past instances of nullification, where states resisted federal laws. The ongoing situation in Illinois mirrors earlier defiance seen in South Carolina in the 1830s when the state refused to comply with a federal tariff. Such stark similarities are troubling for those concerned about governance and the rule of law.
As Chicago continues down this contentious path, the ramifications for American citizens and their safety remain paramount. The local government’s focus on protecting illegal immigrants has raised significant concerns about public order. Residents are left to grapple with an unsettling reality: that their safety and well-being may be secondary in a city where the motto seems to prioritize illegal aliens over its own citizens. This situation calls for serious contemplation and reform, lest the divisions within the community deepen further.
"*" indicates required fields
