When it comes to the race for attorney general in Virginia, the spotlight is firmly on candidate Jay Jones. Recently, violent text messages linked to Jones have thrown his campaign into turmoil. The reactions from Democrats have varied, with many choosing silence or offering vague support for him, even as they sharply criticize the content of the messages. This situation raises significant questions about the future of his candidacy and the potential for Democrats to find a replacement.
Virginia operates under a distinct set of election laws compared to states like Pennsylvania. The Department of Elections manages the electoral process. According to an official from this department, there are specific regulations that dictate what can happen when a candidate is embroiled in controversy. Under Code 24.2-612.2, Jones, like any candidate, has the option of withdrawing his name from the race. However, he must do this within 60 days of the election to ensure his name is removed from the ballot.
Early voting in Virginia presents another complication. Voters have already begun casting ballots, as the voting season starts earlier than in many other states. As the situation stands, even if Jones decides to step aside, any votes cast for him during the early voting period will still count. This could inadvertently aid his opponent, Republican incumbent Jason Miyares, by splitting the vote among Democratic supporters.
Recent tallies indicate a significant level of early participation, with over 420,000 ballots already submitted by mail or in person, far surpassing the returns from the 2021 elections. Historically, Democrats have favored early and mail-in voting, which adds another layer of urgency to Jones’s predicament.
If Jones chooses to withdraw, Virginia law provides a mechanism for political parties under Code 24.2-612.1. After ballots are printed, it requires election offices to announce at polling sites that the candidate has withdrawn. Notices will be placed at polling locations and included with mail-in ballots to inform voters about the situation. This means that while Jones’s name may remain on the ballot, any votes he receives would go uncounted due to his withdrawal.
In this context, the Democratic Party could rally behind a new candidate as a write-in option. Such a maneuver has seen limited success historically in Virginia, particularly in non-competitive races. In recent decades, only two write-in candidates in competitive elections have succeeded. One notable instance was Nick Freitas, a Republican who emerged victorious after his name was not included on the ballot due to a paperwork error. He garnered around 58% of the votes in his 2019 race.
The fallout from Jones’s violent text messages highlights ongoing tensions within the Democratic Party. Will party leaders coalesce around a replacement candidate? Can they effectively communicate with voters about the changes? As the election approaches, the answers to these questions hold significant weight for both party morale and electoral success.
"*" indicates required fields
