Hollywood stands at a critical juncture, facing a crisis that threatens to dismantle its long-standing dominance in the entertainment industry. The combination of a recent writers’ strike and the infusion of progressive themes into film narratives has led to a significant erosion of both influence and financial viability. Current indicators suggest things may worsen before they improve.
The Filmmakers Alliance starkly states that Hollywood is in decline, with a staggering 42,000 jobs lost in merely two years. The sentiment among those in the industry has coalesced into a desperate mantra: “Survive ’til ’25.” Amidst this bleak outlook, a recent article in The Wall Street Journal has labeled the production landscape in Los Angeles a “disaster movie.” The scale of the fallout is alarming. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the motion picture industry employed about 100,000 individuals in Los Angeles County at the close of 2024—down from around 142,000 two years prior. This represents nearly a third of the workforce simply evaporating.
Furthermore, the decline shows no signs of pausing. The report from WSJ highlights the plight of seasoned professionals in the industry. An Oscar-winning sound mixer cannot find work, while an animator formerly involved with classics like Pocahontas has joined the ranks of the unemployed. These stories underscore the harsh reality of talented individuals forced to reevaluate their careers in an increasingly inhospitable Hollywood.
Adding to the grim picture, FilmLA reported a 22% drop in on-location production during the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. Television production is particularly suffering. The region previously experienced a peak of 18,560 shoot days annually in 2021, but this number plummeted to just 7,716 by 2024—yielding an astonishing 58.4% reduction in just three years.
John Nolte, in a critique highlighted by Breitbart News, identifies clear reasons for the downturn. Studios have cut back on production because the flood of content they released failed to attract sufficient streaming subscribers to recoup costs. Nolte asserts that much of this content was subpar, riddled with what he terms “woketardery,” and pushed narratives out of touch with mainstream audiences. This disconnection has left studios in a precarious position, struggling to justify investments in new projects.
The costs associated with producing content also contribute significantly to Hollywood’s struggles. Union mandates have rendered crew costs exorbitant, particularly compared to more affordable locales such as Georgia and overseas. Coupled with the high cost of living in Los Angeles—including taxes, energy expenses, and housing—the barriers to production become even more pronounced.
These elevated living costs can be traced to the policies enforced by local and state leadership. In a city and state dominated by a single political ideology, the repercussions have been dire. Rising housing costs and stagnated wages continue to plague many residents. Additionally, the attitude toward energy sustainability has exacerbated high energy costs, which ripple across the economy.
Many argue that the most straightforward solution to revitalize Hollywood is to focus on producing quality content that resonates with audiences rather than pushing ideologies that alienate potential viewers. However, there appears to be a reluctance within the industry to heed this practical approach as it continues down a path fraught with self-generated challenges.
This ongoing saga in Hollywood reflects a broader trend where a previously influential industry finds itself self-sabotaging, risking its future on the altar of ideological conformity rather than artistic merit and audience engagement. The road ahead remains uncertain, but the current indicators paint a picture of an industry struggling to find its footing amidst economic and creative turmoil.
"*" indicates required fields
