Greg Kelly and Newsmax spotlight Joel Gilbert’s extensive reporting on Letitia James, highlighting allegations that span multiple years and involve serious misconduct, including mortgage fraud and deceitful loan applications. In an interview, Gilbert, an independent investigative reporter and film producer, elaborated on the evidence he has gathered against James. He claims that her fraudulent activities date back decades, starting as far back as 1983.
Gilbert asserts he has compiled a “mountain of evidence” showing James engaged in a pattern of mortgage fraud, beginning with her first townhome purchase where she allegedly misrepresented familial relations to secure a loan. “She claimed in her very first purchase of a townhome that she had married her father in order to qualify for the loan,” Gilbert explained, underscoring that this kind of deceit demonstrates an intentional disregard for the law. James, known for prosecuting others for similar offenses, cannot claim ignorance, Gilbert contends.
The implications of Gilbert’s findings extend beyond mere allegations. He predicts that James could face “more superseding indictments” tied to various properties, including a potentially significant indictment related to a Brooklyn apartment building. Kelly, noting the public attention surrounding James, expressed skepticism about her perceived invulnerability. He remarked, “Something tells me that’s not true, that this is a real case and it could do real harm to her, i.e., incarceration or losing her law license.”
Gilbert echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the weight of the evidence against her. He criticizes James for attempting to portray herself as a victim, claiming, “she has a pattern of 24 years in two states on four different properties of blatant mortgage fraud.” This accumulating evidence and the nature of the allegations, he argues, make it increasingly difficult for her to evade accountability.
Additionally, Gilbert points out specific financial misconduct involving a government loan under the HAMP program. He alleges that James falsely claimed financial hardship while earning $14,000 a month, facilitating a loan that benefited from taxpayer support. “She wanted to get 2.7% on the back of the American taxpayer,” Gilbert stated, demonstrating how he believes she exploited her position for personal gain.
As the interview progresses, Gilbert expresses a strong belief that the evidence against James is too substantial for her to dismiss lightly. He reinforces this idea by stating, “I don’t think she’s going to last very long. I think she’s going to have to cop a plea.” The notion of facing numerous indictments creates a sense of urgency, suggesting that the legal repercussions for James could be severe.
This dialogue captures a growing concern about the integrity of public officials and their adherence to the laws they enforce. Gilbert’s thorough investigation highlights serious allegations of hypocrisy and misconduct in James’s tenure, especially given her high-profile legal battles against former President Trump. The consequences of these findings could have lasting implications for James’s career and her role as the Attorney General of New York.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen what legal actions will follow and whether James can mount a defense against what appears to be a compelling and lengthy record of alleged fraud. The stakes are high, and as both Kelly and Gilbert assert, the path forward does not appear favorable for James.
"*" indicates required fields
