Fox News host Greg Gutfeld sharply criticized prominent Trump detractors during a recent episode of “Gutfeld!” His comments came in response to a peace agreement between Israel and Gaza, which many attribute to the diplomatic groundwork laid by former President Donald Trump’s policies.
“Don’t you owe the people you mocked an apology?” Gutfeld challenged his critics. His rhetorical question highlighted the absence of response from figures known for their public disdain for Trump. He emphasized their silence with biting humor, declaring, “They’re so small, I can’t SEE THEM!” This sets the tone for a segment that digs into the importance of Trump’s earlier foreign policy moves, particularly the Abraham Accords, which established normalization between Israel and various Arab nations.
Gutfeld laid out his perspective on Trump’s unconventional yet effective foreign policy. He noted that, despite regular criticism, Trump was instrumental in reshaping alliances in the Middle East. “This guy is solving world peace,” Gutfeld declared, also mentioning Trump’s efforts to enhance border security and reduce crime. The host’s comments serve as a reminder that Trump’s diplomatic strategies retain relevance, even amidst ongoing political contention.
Further in the segment, Gutfeld specifically targeted vocal critics such as Bill Kristol, Adam Kinzinger, and Liz Cheney. He suggested these individuals felt threatened by Trump’s successes. “Perhaps your ego was HURT by the fact he believed these great things could happen,” he stated. He followed this with a humorous nod to their absence, proposing a potential show on Fox Nation titled “Where Are They Now?”
This segment reflects a struggle against a broader political narrative. Gutfeld utilized this moment to elucidate the impact of Trump’s successes, pointing out the irony that many who continuously criticize him have remained silent as the dynamics he affected continue to evolve. Under Trump, the Abraham Accords led to historic agreements. While they did not result in a Nobel Peace Prize for Trump, their significance is undeniable.
Gutfeld expressed his frustration about how critics might reconcile their jabs with the tangible international developments emerging from Trump’s actions. He directly asked, “How do you look in the mirror… after years of mocking people who had faith in this guy?” This question resonates with viewers fed up with dismissive attitudes towards those who support Trump and believe in his policies.
Notably, Gutfeld refrained from defending Trump’s character or rhetoric—a common strategy for those on his side. Instead, he argued that it was Trump’s boldness and resolve that yielded results in a landscape often filled with declined opportunities. “He thought big. He sees everything as a moonshot,” Gutfeld remarked, emphasizing Trump’s distinctive approach compared to the previous administrations, which he criticized for their “managed decline.”
His energy during this segment captures a moment of renewed confidence among conservative viewers, who have long felt overlooked. Gutfeld’s commentary suggests that tangible accomplishments should not be overshadowed by personal conduct. By drawing attention to this discrepancy, he invites viewers to reconsider the weight of results over personalities in political discourse.
As the political landscape shifts and Trump emerges as a leading candidate for the 2024 GOP nomination, Gutfeld’s remarks highlight the importance of foreign policy achievements in upcoming campaigns. They challenge both sides of the aisle to recognize successful outcomes, regardless of whether those outcomes emerged from unconventional methods.
While responses from analysts are mixed, the ongoing conversation about Trump’s foreign policy legacy is poised to shape the next electoral cycle. As metrics indicate improvements in border security and crime reduction, Gutfeld’s fiery critique underscores a broader recognition sought by many. “He would not accept the managed decline and the constant death,” he concluded, asserting that Trump’s approach deserves acknowledgment for its contributions, even among his critics.
"*" indicates required fields
