The upcoming rally by the “No Kings” coalition raises important questions about the effectiveness and sustainability of protest movements in America today. Scheduled for Saturday, October 18, these demonstrations aim to protest what the group labels an authoritarian overreach by President Donald Trump. However, prominent voices like Scott Adams, the creator of “Dilbert,” have cast doubts on the movement’s vigor and impact. In a pointed tweet, Adams questioned, “Where’s the fight? A bunch of senior citizens marching around with signs that somebody gave them?! Is that the fight? Good luck!” His scathing commentary highlights a growing skepticism regarding the true influence of such mass protests.
The “No Kings” movement emerged as a response to perceived authoritarian tactics from the Trump administration, such as military displays and deportation policies. Organizers hope to reignite the energy from earlier protests that reportedly mobilized millions across the country. Yet, the movement faces criticism for its ability to achieve meaningful outcomes. Critics argue that the demonstrations often resemble political theater more than substantive engagement, echoing sentiments that many observers now share. A local official described it as “A lot of noise, slick websites, good signs, but then Monday rolls around, and nothing’s changed.”
Adding to the skepticism is the movement’s decentralized structure. While meant to empower grassroots actions, it may also weaken accountability. Critics claim this approach could invite manipulation by external forces, blurring the line between genuine civic engagement and spectacle. Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand, cautioned that financial interests and chaos-driven actors increasingly dominate the protest landscape. Swart stated, “If we don’t figure that out, we’re going to keep getting played by the people who thrive on conflict.”
Organizers maintain that the “No Kings” movement stands for democracy against dictatorship. The messaging includes a commitment to nonviolence and local engagement, promising speakers from reputable organizations and calls for collective community action during the rallies. However, even with calls to peace, there are concerns about the potential for unrest. Law enforcement agencies remain vigilant, having previously deployed National Guard troops during past protests. Florida Sheriff Wayne Ivey famously warned in January that threats to law enforcement would be met with lethal force, signaling a tense atmosphere around public demonstrations.
Despite their insistence on peaceful assembly, the utility of such gatherings is increasingly under scrutiny. Nationally, a Gallup poll indicates waning confidence in organized protests, with only 35% of Americans believing these actions lead to meaningful change. This fatigue appears to be especially pronounced among older demographics who may feel disillusioned with the current landscape of political activism.
The fragmented nature of the “No Kings” movement poses a critical challenge. Without a unified message or clear policy demands, the rallies risk becoming little more than regular ritualistic displays rather than a potent political force. Should Saturday’s turnout not meet expectations, it could validate critics like Adams, reinforcing the notion that these protests lack urgency and efficacy.
As the weekend approaches, the stakes are high for the organizers of “No Kings.” They uphold that their previous mobilizations have proven impactful, stating, “In June, we did what many claimed was impossible: peacefully mobilized millions of people to take to the streets.” Whether these protests can indeed translate into genuine political discourse and expectations remains in question. Should the rallies not garner the anticipated numbers or impact, the skepticism toward such movements may only intensify.
The meaning of these protests hangs in the balance. As the public closely observes this weekend’s events, they will likely weigh the louder calls for change against the growing chorus of doubt regarding the protests’ significance. The outcome of Saturday’s turnout could either reignite enthusiasm or deepen the narrative of decline in protest culture across the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
