Analysis: U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s Call for Action at NATO Meeting
On October 15, 2025, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a compelling message during a NATO meeting in Brussels, urging member nations to increase military support for Ukraine. With a marked 43% decline in combined military aid over the summer months, Hegseth’s address highlights urgent realities for NATO and Ukraine as winter approaches.
“You get peace when you are strong,” Hegseth remarked, emphasizing that true peace comes not merely from words or gestures but from the capacity to defend against aggressors. This straightforward assertion encapsulates the crux of military readiness: without the means to defend, advocacy among allies rings hollow. Hegseth’s remarks resonate with a sense of urgency; the implications of faltering support for Ukraine could be dire.
The Secretary’s presence, coming soon after a joint trip to the Middle East with President Trump, underscores a renewed effort by the U.S. to maintain its leadership in global security, crucial as the situation in Ukraine remains precarious. His statement reflects an understanding that effective leadership involves rallying allies and ensuring that commitments translate into action.
A notable aspect of Hegseth’s discussion is the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL), a mechanism intended to streamline military aid. By shifting from direct U.S. arms transfers to a co-financed model among NATO members, the system aims to meet Ukraine’s urgent needs with more predictability and coordination. The fact that NATO members have thus far committed over $2 billion through the PURL program reveals some progress, yet it falls short of the necessary $3.5 billion Ukraine requested by year’s end.
The disparity in contributions among NATO countries raises critical concerns. While Germany, Sweden, Estonia, and Finland have increased their support, other key players like France and the United Kingdom have lagged behind. Underlying this gap is a growing frustration among allies regarding unequal burden-sharing, an issue that could weaken the collective defense effort. A U.S. official’s observation about some partners “not doing enough” resonates in this context, as it highlights broader challenges of maintaining solidarity in a multifaceted crisis.
As Russia persists in controlling significant portions of Ukrainian territory, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s repeated calls for reinforcement emphasize the stakes. With continued drone and missile attacks from Russia, the situation remains dire, validating Hegseth’s assertion that immediate support is crucial. A defense official succinctly summarized the moment: “We either help them now, or we concede later.” This stark choice underscores the necessity for NATO to act decisively.
In stepping up military support, Hegseth’s strategic outlook also touches upon peace negotiations. He advocates for a clear distinction: while there is a willingness to pursue peace, it cannot compromise Ukraine’s sovereignty. “Now is the time to end this tragic war, stop the needless bloodshed,” he stated, reminding allies that real peace is achieved through strength. His words suggest that any meaningful resolution will require robust defense capabilities, not mere dialogue.
Looking ahead, the urgency of meeting Ukraine’s aid request before winter sets in cannot be overstated. Failure to fulfill these commitments risks jeopardizing Ukraine’s defense of essential infrastructure against the harsh winter and relentless Russian aggression. As highlighted in previous years, Ukraine’s defense capacity faltered under pressure, only to rally back due to U.S. support. The current landscape, however, shows that U.S. assistance remains pivotal, particularly as European reserves dwindle and domestic politics complicate the situation.
Hegseth’s final assertion that “this war is a test—not just of Ukraine’s will, but of ours,” serves as a sobering reminder of the interconnectedness of the conflict. The decisions made by NATO countries in the imminent weeks will significantly influence not only Ukraine’s ability to endure but also the credibility of the alliance itself. As the stakes rise, the time for action is now, pressing on leaders to transform rhetorical commitments into tangible support.
"*" indicates required fields
