In a recent discussion on Sinclair’s “The National News Desk,” Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), outlined a strategy for the Trump Administration to pursue funding sources behind Antifa and similar leftist organizations using the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Established by Schweizer in 2012, the GAI specializes in uncovering corruption and misconduct in public sectors by tracing financial trails. Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a leftist radical, Schweizer has sharpened his focus on these groups and their financial backers.
In his conversation with reporter Geoff Harris, Schweizer emphasized that research groups are diligently working to expose who funds Antifa at both the individual and organizational levels. Harris mentioned, “I’m told part of that research starts with following the money trail.” This method highlights how financial streams lead to the organizations allegedly fueling civil unrest. Schweizer explained that many activist groups are connected to tax-exempt nonprofit organizations, often funded by large grant-giving foundations. “Oftentimes getting money from large grant-giving foundations,” he elaborated, underlining how funds are funneled into these radical organizations.
Schweizer articulated the potential for tracking these funds, noting that the IRS mandates financial disclosure through forms such as the 990 form. “So they’re required to disclose to the IRS something called a 990 form. So you can trace a lot of the money that way,” he said. This regulation allows for greater accountability and transparency regarding the financial backers of these groups. Matching actions to financial records may prove crucial in identifying those supporting activities associated with Antifa.
Harris contributed to the dialogue by pointing out that some funders have openly boasted about their financial support for radical groups. He remarked, “In other cases, you can also find people bragging about the support they’ve offered and given to certain groups.” Such admissions exemplify how the radical left can inadvertently shine a light on their funding networks while attempting to display bravado. The revelations unearthed in these findings could yield substantive insights into the operations of these organizations.
Schweizer further reinforced the importance of this investigative approach, contending that while the information available may not be exhaustive, it offers substantial indicators about funding sources and the intentions behind donations. “The information that comes out is not always a complete picture, but I think it’s a pretty good indicator of who the money is coming from and who is receiving the money and what they’re using it for,” he stated. Understanding these financial threads helps demystify the web of funding that supports anarchic activities.
During the discussion, Harris referenced a recent Antifa roundtable meeting convened by the Trump Administration. At that event, Seamus Bruner from the GAI highlighted connections between Antifa and financier George Soros. “At President Trump’s Antifa roundtable last week, Seamus Bruner shared with the administration what they found so far, pointing to investigations showing coordination across cities,” Harris noted. This assertion illustrates how funding networks can span various regions, effectively creating a coordinated effort among disparate groups.
Bruner pointed out the significant roles played by Soros’s Open Society Foundations, the Tides Foundation, and foreign donors like Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss in funding what he described as “Riot Inc.” He further proposed that the law could be leveraged to hold these entities accountable: “RICO could and would be used to hold them accountable.” This approach could establish a legal avenue for addressing the underlying financial mechanisms driving radical protests.
In conclusion, the interview not only lays out a strategic framework for tackling funding sources behind radical groups like Antifa but also sheds light on the broader implications of financial accountability in political activism. The convergence of investigative efforts and financial disclosures could potentially alter the landscape of funding for radical organizations, challenging the status quo rather than allowing unchecked activism to flourish.
"*" indicates required fields
