The upcoming retention election in Pennsylvania has emerged as a pivotal moment for the state’s judiciary, with the potential to reshape its future for a decade or more. GOP activist Scott Presler is forging a path through Pittsburgh, engaging voters directly in their neighborhoods. His grassroots efforts are centered on opposing the retention of three Democratic justices: Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht.
In a recent voice message, Presler stated, “Hi, this is Scott Presler. I’m asking for your vote on Tuesday, November 4th… On the back of your ballot, vote NO to retention for Justices Dougherty, Donohue, and Wecht, otherwise we are STUCK with them until 2035.” His direct outreach underscores the critical stakes of this off-year election.
The ballot itself presents a unique challenge. Voters face a simple yes or no question as they decide whether to retain these justices, with no party labels attached. Yet, the weight of their decision carries far-reaching implications. Currently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is dominated by Democrats, and losing even one seat could tilt the ideological balance, while a rejection of all three could create a significant shift in legal precedent.
The Importance of the Court
Recent years have shown that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is not just a passive arbiter but an active force in shaping critical policy areas. It has made bold rulings on topics including redistricting, voting access, and abortion rights, reflecting a judicial philosophy that many supporters view as progressive. Critics, however, worry that such activism crosses judicial boundaries.
Law professor Bruce Ledewitz observes the court’s dynamic approach: “This liberal majority is much more activist… It is also very well-grounded by the text and history of the Pennsylvania Constitution.” This rhetoric emphasizes the robust foundation of the justices’ decisions, yet it also highlights concerns from activists who feel that the court’s actions could politically overreach.
Long-Term Impact
The implications of retaining these justices extend well beyond immediate concerns. If retained, they will influence pivotal rulings until their mandatory retirement at age 75, shaping judicial outcomes on vital issues. Presler articulated this urgency, stating, “What people don’t realize is you’re not just voting on these seats for the next year or so—you’re locking in their decisions for the next decade.”
This election is crucial for those seeking to interrupt what they perceive as unchecked liberal judicial power. With ample funding flowing into both liberal and conservative campaigns, the stakes have never been higher. In 2023 alone, over $20 million was pumped into Pennsylvania judicial races—a clear sign of heightened political engagement.
Mobilizing the Voters
On the ground, both parties are ramping up their voter outreach efforts. Major backers, such as Elon Musk’s Early Action PAC, are fueling these initiatives, signaling a concerted push to activate voters in typically low-turnout areas. Presler’s voice message was just one part of a broader strategy that encompasses flyers, door-to-door visits, and calls. He captures the essence of this campaign: “Please vote. Thank you so much for your time. I’m leaving behind a flyer for you.”
Opponents to Presler’s stance, including advocacy groups, are also working diligently to ensure that voters recognize the importance of judicial retention. They emphasize the need for competent judges who prioritize fair rulings over partisan outcomes. However, the bar for what “fair” means can differ greatly depending on one’s political perspective.
Voting Methods and Key Deadlines
As November 4 approaches, Pennsylvania voters have several avenues for casting their ballots. Applications for mail-in voting must be submitted by October 28. In-person early voting is available, and Election Day will see polls operate from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Voter registration closes on October 20, so potential voters should act quickly. Crucially, the retention questions will appear on the back of the ballot, devoid of any direct competition or party affiliation. Voters will need to choose “yes” or “no,” reflecting a significant yet often overlooked decision.
A Critical but Underexamined Choice
The absence of party labels on the ballot may lead many to overlook the significance of their decisions regarding judicial retention. However, this election is about much more than just three individual justices. It positions the Pennsylvania Supreme Court at the heart of statewide disputes over democratic processes, redistricting, and individual rights.
With major legislative changes on the horizon, such as new congressional maps due by 2027 and ongoing challenges to voting access, the court’s direction will set crucial precedents. Removing just one justice could pivot the court’s approach and significantly impact future legislative and judicial outcomes.
In many ways, Presler’s campaign is emblematic of the broader political landscape, where every vote holds the potential to generate significant legal ripple effects. While his door-knocking may appear to be a grassroots effort, the consequences of these judicial decisions could resonate throughout the state for years to come.
"*" indicates required fields
