David French’s recent critique in The New York Times stirred considerable conversation amidst a perceived revival in American Christianity. The reaction to the shocking murder of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk has ignited discussions about faith and devotion, prompting many Americans to recommit to their churches and Bibles. This surge of interest in spirituality has some declaring a potential national revival, a stark contrast to French’s reservations.
French, who often finds himself at the center of conservative discourse, encapsulates his concern in his piece titled, “Something Is Stirring in Christian America, and It’s Making Me Nervous.” He concedes that, as a believer who has lamented the decline in church participation, he should find joy in these developments. Yet, he expresses unease about what he perceives as a “sin of empathy” among Christians. This phrase points to his belief that some have allowed emotional responses to overshadow Biblical truth, potentially leading Christians to affirm questionable actions in the name of love.
He raises an important caution regarding the emotional engagement that some Christians have with marginalized groups, including illegal immigrants and those struggling with controversial issues like abortion. French’s handling of these topics exposes a tension within contemporary Christian thought—how to embody compassion while holding true to doctrinal integrity.
During Kirk’s service, strong affirmations of faith came from influential figures, including White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who pledged to combat what he called leftist threats to national security. French does not celebrate this public display of faith, which reached millions. Instead, he appears apprehensive about these fervent expressions of political and spiritual conviction. His reluctance to embrace a more uplifting view reflects not just a personal disposition but also highlights a broader hesitation within some parts of the Christian community to fully understand and embrace potential revival.
French’s cautious stance elicited sharp responses from fellow conservatives, notably from William Wolfe of Center for Baptist Leadership, who quipped on social media about French’s anxiety. Wolfe’s comment underscores a growing sentiment among conservatives who find optimism in the ongoing spiritual awakening. The mocking tone suggests a belief that complacency in faith might be more concerning than robust expressions of belief, even if they veer into political territory.
Moreover, Daily Wire reporter Megan Basham chimed in, suggesting that French’s nervousness might signal deeper issues within his own understanding of faith. Her commentary invites reflection on the nature of revival itself. Genuine revival should be marked not only by increased church attendance but also by a collective turning away from societal sins, such as abortion and moral decay.
The crux of the matter is whether this enthusiasm is a fleeting emotional response or a substantial shift in American spirituality. As Wolfe and Basham point out, the authenticity of this revival hinges on a sincere desire among believers to confront uncomfortable truths, acknowledging the need for repentance and restoration.
French’s apprehension raises critical questions. If fear accompanies powerful moves of God, what does his discomfort indicate about his perspective on faith’s transformative potential? The dialogue surrounding his opinion piece reflects a broader struggle—balancing modern social issues with foundational beliefs in a rapidly changing cultural landscape.
Ultimately, the conversation ignited by French’s article highlights the complexity of faith in public life. As more individuals contemplate their relationship with God, the potential for genuine revival looms, yet it remains dependent on a collective willingness to grapple with both love and truth. The very soul of American Christianity may be at stake, particularly as it navigates the turbulent waters of contemporary moral challenges.
"*" indicates required fields
