At a recent public event, a moment between Democrat Senators Cory Booker and Adam Schiff captured attention for its theatricality rather than its substance. As the two embraced and chanted, “This is what democracy looks like,” the crowd’s reaction was tepid at best, with one observer commenting, “The crowd goes mild.” This sentiment reflects a broader concern about the nature of political discourse today, particularly within the Democratic Party.
This display has sparked a discussion regarding the party’s priorities. Are the Democrats focused on meaningful policy, or have they veered toward superficial gestures? The unsettling truth is that posturing seems to be replacing genuine accountability in political conversation. A chant, once filled with grassroots vigor, now feels like a scripted performance by career politicians rather than a sincere movement for change.
The timing of this public theatrics is particularly striking against a backdrop of urgent issues that demand serious attention. Just weeks earlier, bipartisan lawmakers were knee-deep in discussions following a tragic aviation accident that claimed 67 lives. Senators from both parties came together to address failures in aviation safety and oversight, drafting the ROTOR Act to implement necessary upgrades. In sharp contrast to the song and dance in front of the cameras, these lawmakers focused on hard data and accountability. As the Senate Commerce Committee noted, lapses in technology implementation were critical to the disaster, underscoring that results, not slogans, save lives.
Yet, slogans are what still resonate in the current political environment. The embrace and chant from Booker and Schiff symbolize a broader trend where the political elite appears disconnected from the core issues affecting the American public. This is further highlighted by a Pew Research poll revealing that only 24% of Americans believe their elected officials prioritize the public good. Among older individuals, distrust has reached staggering lows of just 17%.
Foreign policy discussions amplify this disconnect. Recent criticisms directed at Democratic leaders—aligning with foreign governments accused of severe human rights violations—shed light on a troubling hypocrisy. How could these leaders profess to uphold democratic values while simultaneously supporting regimes that undermine them? As one opinion piece indicated, “A politics that tolerates the mass destruction of an entire people cannot credibly claim to stand for democratic values.”
For party leaders, such disconnect poses a significant risk. Rather than energizing their base, grand gestures may alienate voters who see them as out of touch. The phrase “This is what democracy looks like,” originally a rallying cry against injustice, now rings hollow when used by politicians without an accompanying narrative of struggle or victory. This dilution of meaning is evident in public reaction—nobody in the crowd reciprocated the enthusiasm of the chant.
While some within the party may argue the importance of unity in response to political attacks, these claims lack weight against the backdrop of legislative inaction. The ongoing federal shutdown exemplifies this issue, leaving critical services like Medicare and military pay in limbo. Senators and representatives have found themselves bogged down in negotiations that may prioritize their political ambitions over the needs of the public.
With Republicans gaining traction in recent polling, particularly among older and working-class voters, a clear message emerges. If Democratic leaders continue to rely on symbolic displays rather than deliver substantive policy changes, they risk losing the very support that once helped secure their power. The RealClearPolitics average shows Republicans leading Democrats by 2.3% in generic congressional ballot polls—a concerning shift for a party that once dominated those demographics.
Back in Washington, while Booker and Schiff may engage in important initiatives like mental health policy expansion, such efforts often get overshadowed by moments designed for media consumption. The core question lingers: who are these displays truly meant to resonate with? The underwhelming audience response at the recent event suggests a growing chasm between political elites and the voters they claim to represent.
In a time when genuine engagement with the public is paramount, the silence following such staged performances may speak louder than any chant. For the Democratic Party to remain relevant, a return to meaningful dialogue and accountability is essential. Otherwise, they risk becoming mere spectators in a political landscape that demands action over rhetoric.
"*" indicates required fields
