In the ongoing mayoral race in New York City, Zohran Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, has drawn substantial attention, even as he faces a notable absence of support from Democrats across the Hudson River in New Jersey. As the Garden State gears up for its gubernatorial election, Mamdani’s campaign is somewhat overshadowed by other political events. New Jersey Representative Mikie Sherrill, who is running for governor, has chosen to focus solely on her state, stating, “I’m not getting engaged in that race… I’m going to let the people of New York decide that race.” This comment encapsulates the reluctance of New Jersey’s Democratic leadership to engage with Mamdani’s candidacy, highlighting a significant political distancing.
Mamdani’s progressive stances have met fierce opposition, not just from Republicans but even from within his party. Critics label him “communist,” a term he contests, asserting that his beliefs do not align with traditional communist ideologies. Nonetheless, his history of advocating for policies like the seizure of the “means of production” and a hefty tax plan targeting the wealthiest New Yorkers raises eyebrows. Even fellow Democrats such as Sherrill, who initially signaled some level of support, have walked back their endorsements as the election approaches. Earlier, Sherrill expressed moderate enthusiasm about his chances, saying, “If he’s the Democratic candidate… I assume I will [support him].” However, she refrained from making a commitment later on.
In this climate, New Jersey’s Democratic leaders have largely remained silent, with Governor Phil Murphy and Senator Andy Kim also not weighing in on Mamdani’s campaign. Meanwhile, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a fellow Democrat, has taken a stark stance against him, describing Mamdani as “a job-killing socialist” and linking his policies to increased taxes and an alleged antisemitic stance. Gottheimer is clear: “You will hear no ambiguity out of my mouth… We do not need a job-killing socialist.” Such remarks underline the internal conflict within the Democratic Party about aligning with progressive platforms, particularly one as radical as Mamdani’s. He has called for eliminating traditional definitions of antisemitism, which has also drawn sharp criticism.
Former Mayor Bill de Blasio has sided with Mamdani, portraying him as a solution to the issues stemming from policies associated with the previous administration. However, the palpable rift among Democrats reveals a party grappling with its identity as it heads into the 2025 election cycle. While some lesser-known New Jersey officials have embraced Mamdani, like Newark’s Mayor Ras Baraka, these endorsements come from figures less likely to influence broader political dynamics. Baraka, who has his own controversial history with federal authorities, showed solidarity with Mamdani, but his support doesn’t carry as much weight as those from higher-profile politicians who have remained distant.
NJ Democrats’ avoidance of Mamdani is telling and reflects the larger stakes in statewide and national elections. The gubernatorial race in New Jersey is shaping up to be high-stakes, especially in the wake of renewed Republican interest in the state following a strong turnout for Trump in the last election cycle. New Jersey has historically leaned blue, but the recent shift towards Republicans in several counties has sparked concern within Democratic ranks. It raises questions about the viability of a candidate like Mamdani in a state where traditional Democratic values are under scrutiny.
Ultimately, the narrative surrounding Mamdani’s candidacy poses important discussions about the broader Democratic agenda and regional party dynamics. With key party figures distancing themselves, the potential impact of his race on the gubernatorial campaign remains uncertain. As much as some leaders support progressive movements, the fear of alienating moderate voters may lead many to opt for silence over endorsement.
The 2025 off-year cycle is shaping up to be pivotal, and as Mamdani pushes forward, he does so against a backdrop of cautious alliances and strategic political distancing. Whether he can break through the challenges posed by his own party remains to be seen, but the lingering question about his support reveals the intricacies of political allegiance in a time of shifting views.
"*" indicates required fields
