The New York City mayoral race has taken a dramatic turn, with Zohran Mamdani’s rise to a staggering 93% probability of winning, shaking up the political landscape. This surge comes despite substantial establishment support for Andrew Cuomo from Mayor Eric Adams, underscoring a profound shift among city voters.
The endorsement by Adams has not stemmed Mamdani’s momentum. Polling data reveals he leads with 49% support among registered voters, climbing to 52% among those likely to cast a ballot. Cuomo, once expected to dominate the race, now sits at 28%, while Republican Curtis Sliwa languishes at 13%. Adams’s late arrival into the fray—after suspending his campaign—has so far not registered in the polling numbers, leaving him in single digits.
While Mamdani has gained traction, critics raise alarms over his past associations. A widely circulated social media post refers to a photo of Mamdani with a controversial figure, igniting concerns among voters. The post hints at a troubling character narrative that opponents may capitalize on. However, Mamdani remains focused, asserting during debates that he has never supported extremist views.
Recent polling also highlights Mamdani’s ability to connect with key demographics. His favorability has increased, especially among younger voters and those concerned about affordability and racial equity. About two-thirds of voters now describe him as “honest and trustworthy”—crucial traits in a city with a complicated political climate.
Cuomo’s strategy hinges on portraying himself as the experienced candidate who can reclaim control following what he perceives as chaotic ideologies. In a recent debate, he challenged Mamdani directly, asserting, “You never had a job, you never accomplished anything.” This pointed critique aimed to emphasize Mamdani’s perceived lack of executive experience. However, Mamdani countered effectively, bringing the focus back to long-standing allegations against Cuomo: “What do you say to the 13 women who you sexually harassed?” This exchange underscored how personal histories can color political standings.
Despite Cuomo’s robust past and his attempts to reestablish a centrist narrative, Mamdani’s grassroots campaign and leftist policies—including significant reforms to policing and housing—resonate with a city increasingly leaning left. His proposals to demilitarize the NYPD and expand affordable housing units highlight his commitment to progressive reforms, garnering support from marginalized communities.
As the debate unfolds, Cuomo has attempted to create a dichotomy between his established experience and Mamdani’s theoretical approach to governance. However, public sentiment appears to favor change, and the criticism of Mamdani’s “socialist theory colliding with practical reality” has found little traction among voters eager for a new direction.
Sliwa, while trailing behind, remains vocally committed to law-and-order messaging. He berates both Mamdani and Cuomo for their disconnection from the everyday realities faced by New Yorkers. However, his campaign appears to lack the necessary breadth to pose a significant challenge to Mamdani, who has built a solid coalition with underrepresented groups.
The introduction of ranked-choice voting complicates the race. Mamdani’s comments suggesting he might rank Sliwa over Cuomo reveal a strategy to capitalize on anti-establishment sentiment, aiming to attract diverse coalitions that could tip the scales in his favor. Enthusiasm among Mamdani’s supporters also appears robust, with a significant portion indicating they are “extremely” or “very” eager to vote.
The campaign has seen Adams struggling to exert influence, with his late endorsement perhaps doing more harm than good to Cuomo’s cause. Pollster Chris Anderson noted the unpredictability of how Adams’s low support could siphon votes, likely diluting Cuomo’s base rather than boosting Mamdani’s. It paints a challenging picture for traditional power players in the city.
As Election Day approaches, the looming possibility of Mamdani—a democratic socialist—leading America’s largest city reflects a profound moment in political progression. This scenario, previously deemed improbable, signifies a momentum shift—anchored not in the typical political machine, but by a movement that resonates deeply with the aspirations and frustrations of the city’s electorate.
"*" indicates required fields
